The Vitamins
Introduction
In order to demonstrate that a compound is a vitamin, it is
necessary to demonstrate both that deprivation of experimental subjects will
lead to the development of a more or less specific clinical deficiency disease
and abnormal metabolic signs, and that restoration of the missing compound will
prevent or cure the deficiency disease and normalize metabolic abnormalities.
It is not enough simply to demonstrate that a compound has a function in the
body, since it may normally be synthesized in adequate amounts to meet
requirements, or that a compound cures a disease, since this may simply reflect
a pharmacological action and not indicate that the compound is a dietary
essential.
The vitamins, and their principal functions and deficiency
signs, are shown in Table 8.1; the curious nomenclature is a consequence of the
way in which they were discovered at the beginning of the twentieth century.
Early studies showed that there was some-thing in milk that was essential, in
very small amounts, for the growth of animals fed on a diet consisting of
purified fat, carbohydrate, protein, and mineral salts.
Two factors were found to be essential: one was found in the
cream and the other in the watery part of milk. Logically, they were called
factor A (fat-soluble, in the cream) and factor B (water-soluble, in the watery
part of the milk). Factor B was identified chemically as an amine, and in 1913
the name “vitamin” was coined for these “vital amines.”
Further studies showed that “vitamin B” was a mixture of a
number of compounds, with different actions in the body, and so they were given
numbers as well: vitamin B1, vitamin B2, and so on. There
are gaps in the numerical order of the B vitamins. When what might have been
called vitamin B3 was discovered, it was found to be a chemical
compound that was already known, nicotinic acid. It was therefore not given a
number. Other gaps are because compounds that were assumed to be vitamins and
were given numbers, such as B4 and B5, were later shown
either not to be vitamins, or to be vitamins that had already been described by
other workers and given other names.
Vitamins C, D and E were named in the order of their discovery.
The name “vitamin F” was used at one time for what we now call the essential
fatty acids; “vitamin G” was later found to be what was already
As the chemistry of the vitamins was elucidated, so they were
given names as well, as shown in Table 8.1. When only one chemical compound has
the biologi-cal activity of the vitamin, this is quite easy. Thus, vitamin B1
is thiamin, vitamin B2 is riboflavin, etc. With several of the
vitamins, a number of chemically related compounds found in foods can be
intercon-verted in the body, and all show the same biological activity. Such
chemically related compounds are called vitamers, and a general name (a generic
descrip-tor) is used to include all compounds that display the same biological
activity.
Some compounds have important metabolic func-tions, but are not
considered to be vitamins, since, as far as is known, they can be synthesized
in the body in adequate amounts to meet requirements. These include carnitine,
choline, inositol, taurine, and ubiquinone.
Two compounds that are generally considered to be vitamins can
be synthesized in the body, normally in adequate amounts to meet requirements:
vitamin D, which is synthesized from 7-dehydrocholesterol in the skin on
exposure to sunlight, and niacin, which is synthesized from the essential amino
acid tryptophan. However, both were discovered as a result of studies of
deficiency diseases that were, during the early twentieth century, significant
public health problems: rickets (due to vitamin D deficiency and inadequate
sunlight exposure) and pellagra (due to deficiency of both tryptophan and
preformed niacin).
Related Topics
Privacy Policy, Terms and Conditions, DMCA Policy and Compliant
Copyright © 2018-2023 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.