UNPROVEN
AND UNCONVENTIONAL THERAPIES
A diagnosis of cancer evokes many emotions in patients and fam-ilies,
including feelings of fear, frustration, and loss of control. Despite
increasing 5-year survival rates with the use of tradi-tional methods of
treatment, a significant number of patients use or seriously consider using
some form of unconventional treat-ment. Hopelessness, desperation, unmet needs,
lack of factual information, and family or social pressures are major factors
that motivate patients to seek unconventional methods of treatment and allow
them to fall prey to deceptive practices and quackery. Although research is scant
and accuracy of reporting may be questionable, it is estimated that 30% to 50%
of patients with cancer may be using a complementary or alternative method of
treatment.
Caring for patients who choose unconventional methods may place members
of the health care team in difficult situations pro-fessionally, legally, and
ethically. Nurses must keep in mind those ethical principles that help guide
professional practice, such as autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and
justice.
Unconventional treatments have not demonstrated scientifi-cally, in an
objective, reproducible method, the ability to cure or control cancer. In
addition to being ineffective, some unconven-tional treatments may also be
harmful to patients and may cost thousands of dollars. Most unproven cancer
treatments can be categorized as machines and devices, drugs and biologicals,
meta-bolic and dietary regimens, or mystical and spiritual approaches.
Electrical gadgets and devices are commonly reputed to cure can-cers.
Most are operated by people with questionable training who report unrealistic
and unlikely success stories. Such machines are often decorated with elaborate
lights and dials and produce vibrations or other sensations.
Medicinal agents, herbs, proteins (such as shark cartilage),
mega-vitamins (including vitamin C therapy), immune therapy, vac-cines,
enzymes, hydrogen peroxide, and sera have been frequent components of
fraudulent cancer therapy. These agents have included oral, intravenous, and
external medications derived from weeds, flowers, and herbs and the blood and
urine of patients and animals. Many of these agents, especially in megadoses,
can be toxic and can have untoward interactions with concomitant med-ications.
Herbs commonly used by individuals with cancer in-clude echinacea, essiac,
ginseng, green tea, pau d’arco, and hoxsey (Montbriand, 1999). Many of these
treatments are costly.
Metabolic and dietary regimens emphasize the ingestion of only natural
substances to purify the body and retard cancerous growth. These regimens
include the grape diet, the carrot juice diet, garlic, onions, various teas,
coffee enemas, and raw liver in-take. Laetrile (vitamin B, amygdalin), one of
the best-known forms of cancer quackery, was advocated as an agent to kill
tumor cells by releasing cyanide, which is especially toxic to malignant cells.
The National Cancer Institute, in response to public demand, investigated the
effects of laetrile and reported no therapeutic benefits with its use; indeed,
many toxic effects (cyanide poisoning, fever, rash, headache, vomiting,
diarrhea, and hypotension) were reported. Macrobiotic diets have also been
advocated as a cancer treatment to reestablish balance between the major forces
in the universe, yin and yang. People who adhere to macrobiotic diets tend to
develop vitamin, mineral, and protein deficiencies; experience additional
weight loss due to decreased calorie intake; and receive no therapeutic
benefits from the diet.
Traditional Chinese medicine attempts to balance chi forces in order to
heal the body. Mystical or spiritual approaches to cancer therapy include such
techniques as psychic surgery, faith healing, “laying on of hands,” prayer groups,
and invocation of mystical universal powers to kill cancerous growths. These
techniques are difficult to disclaim because they are based on faith.
A trusting relationship, supportive care, and promotion of hope in the
patient and family are the most effective means of protect-ing them from
fraudulent therapy and questionable cancer cures. Truthful responses given in a
nonjudgmental manner to questions and inquiries about unproven methods of
cancer treatments may alleviate the fear and guilt on the part of the patient
and family that they are not “doing everything we can” to obtain a cure. The
nurse may inform the patient and family of the characteristics common to
fraudulent therapy so that they will be informed and cautious when evaluating
other forms of “therapy.” The nurse should encourage any patient who uses
unconventional therapies to inform the physician about such use. Knowing this
information can help prevent interactions with medications and other thera-pies
that may be prescribed and avoid attributing the side effects of unconventional
therapies to prescribed medications.
Related Topics
Privacy Policy, Terms and Conditions, DMCA Policy and Compliant
Copyright © 2018-2023 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.