Complications Associated with Needle or Catheter Insertion
As with other regional anesthesia techniques,
neuraxial blocks are associated with a small, but measureable, failure rate
that is usually inversely proportional to the clinician’s experience. Failure
may still occur, even when CSF is obtained during spinal anesthesia. Movement
of the needle during injection, incomplete entry of the needle opening into the
subarachnoid space, subdural injection, or loss of potency of the local
anesthetic solution may be responsible. Causes for failed epidural blocks were
discussed above (see “Failed Epidural Blocks”).
Accidental intravascular injection of the local anesthetic for epidural
and caudal anesthesia can produce very high serum levels. Extremely high levels
of local anesthetics affect the central ner-vous system (seizure and
unconsciousness) and the cardiovascular system (hypotension, arrhythmias, and
depressed contractility). Because the dosage of medication for spinal
anesthesia is relatively small, this complication is seen after epidural and
caudal (but not spinal) blocks. Local anesthetic may be injected directly into
a vessel through a needle or later through a catheter that has entered a blood
vessel (vein). The incidence of intravascular injec-tion can be minimized by
carefully aspirating the needle (or catheter) before every injection, using a
test dose, always injecting local anesthetic in incre-mental doses, and close
observation for early signs of intravascular injection (tinnitus, lingual
sensa-tions). Treatment is resuscitative, and lipid rescue should be employed.
The local anesthetics vary in their propensity to produce severe cardiac
toxicity. The rank order of local anesthetic potency at producing seizures and
cardiac toxicity is the same as the rank order for potency at nerve blocks.
Chloroprocaine has relatively low potency and also is metabolized very rapidly;
lidocaine and mepivacaine are intermediate in potency and toxicity; and levobupivacaine,
ropi-vacaine, bupivacaine, and tetracaine are most potent and toxic.
Total spinal anesthesia can occur following attempted epidural/caudal
anesthesia if there is accidental intrathecal injection. Onset is usually
rapid, because the amount of anesthetic required for epidural and caudal
anesthesia is 5–10 times that required for spinal anesthesia. Careful
aspiration, use of a test dose, and incremental injection tech-niques during
epidural and caudal anesthesia can help avoid this complication.
As with accidental intravascular injection,
and because of the larger amount of local anesthetic administered, accidental
subdural injection of local anesthetic during attempted epidural anesthesia is
much more serious than during attempted spinal anesthesia. A subdural injection
of epidural doses of local anesthetic produces a clinical presenta-tion similar
to that of high spinal anesthesia, with the exception that the onset may be
delayed for 15–30 min and the block may be “patchy”. The spi-nal subdural space
is a potential space between the dura and the arachnoid containing a small
amount of serous fluid. Unlike the epidural space, the sub-dural space extends
intracranially, so that anesthetic injected into the spinal subdural space can
ascend to higher levels than epidural medications. As with high spinal
anesthesia, treatment is supportive and may require intubation, mechanical
ventilation, and cardiovascular support. The effects generally last from one to
several hours.
As a needle passes through skin, subcutaneous tis-sues, muscle, and
ligaments it causes varying degrees of tissue trauma. Bruising and a localized
inflamma-tory response with or without reflex muscle spasm may be responsible
for postoperative backache. One should remember that up to 25% to 30% of
patients receiving general anesthesia also complain of back-ache
postoperatively, and a significant percentage of the general population has
chronic back pain. Postoperative back soreness or ache is usually mild and
self-limited, although it may last for a number of weeks. If treatment is
sought, acetaminophen, NSAIDs, and warm or cold compresses should suf-fice.
Although backache is usually benign, it may be an important clinical sign of
much more seri-ous complications, such as epidural hematoma and abscess .
Any breach of the dura may result in a postdural puncture headache
(PDPH). This may follow a diagnostic lumbar puncture, a myelogram, a spinal
anesthetic, or an epidural “wet tap” in which the epidural needle passed
through the epidural space and entered the subarachnoid space. Similarly, an
epidural catheter might puncture the dura at any time and result in PDPH. An
epidural wet tap is usually immediately recognized as CSF pouring from the
epidural needle or aspirated from an epi-dural
catheter. However, PDPH can follow a seem-ingly uncomplicated epidural
anesthetic and may be the result of just the tip of the needle scratching
through the dura. Typically, PDPH is bilateral, fron-tal or retroorbital, or
occipital and extends into the neck. It may be throbbing or constant and
associ-ated with photophobia and nausea. The hallmark of PDPH is its
association with body position. The pain is aggravated by sitting or standing
and relieved or decreased by lying down flat. The onset of headache is usually
12–72 hr following the procedure; how-ever, it may be seen almost immediately.
Untreated, the pain may last weeks, and in rare instances, has required surgical
repair.
PDPH is believed to result from leakage of
CSF from a dural defect and intracranial hypotension. Loss of CSF at a rate
faster than it can be produced causes traction on structures supporting the
brain, particularly the meninges, dura, and tentorium. Increased traction on
blood vessels and cranial nerves may also contribute to the pain. Traction on
the cranial nerves may occasionally cause diplopia (usually the sixth cranial
nerve) and tinnitus. The incidence of PDPH is strongly related to needle size,
needle type, and patient population. The larger the needle, the greater the
likelihood of PDPH. Cutting-point needles are associated with a higher
incidence of PDPH than pencil-point needles of the same gauge. Factors that
increase the risk of PDPH include young age, female sex, and pregnancy. The
greatest risk, then, would be expected following an accidental wet tap with a
large epidural needle in a young woman (perhaps as high as 20% to
50%). The lowest incidence would be expected in an
elderly male using a 27-gauge pencil-point needle (1%). Studies of obstetric
patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for cesarean section with small-gauge
pencil-point needles have shown rates as low as 3% or 4%.
Conservative treatment involves recumbent
positioning, analgesics, intravenous or oral fluid administration, and
caffeine. Keeping the patient supine will decrease the hydrostatic pressure
driv-ing fluid out of the dural hole and minimize the headache. Analgesic
medication may range from acetaminophen to NSAIDs and opioids. Hydration and
caffeine work to stimulate production of CSF. Caffeine further helps by
vasoconstricting intracra-nial vessels. Stool softeners and soft diet are used
to minimize Valsalva straining. Headache may persist for days, despite conservative
therapy.
An epidural blood patch is an effective
treat-ment for PDPH. It involves injecting 15–20 mL of autologous blood into
the epidural space at, or one interspace below, the level of the dural
puncture. It is believed to stop further leakage of CSF by either mass effect
or coagulation. The effect is usually immediate but may take some hours as CSF
production slowly builds intracranial pressure. Approximately 90% of patients
will respond to a single blood patch, and 90% of initial nonresponders will
obtain relief from a second injection. We do not recommend prophy-lactic blood
patching through an epidural catheter that was placed after a wet tap. Not all
patients will develop PDPH, and the tip of the catheter may be many levels away
from the dural defect. Most prac-titioners either offer the epidural blood
patch when PDPH becomes apparent or allow conservative ther-apy a trial of
12–24 hr.
When evaluating patients with presumed PDPH, other sources of headache,
including men-ingeal infection and subarachnoid hemorrhage, should be
considered in the differential diagnosis.
Perhaps no complication is more perplexing or
distressing than persistent neurological deficits fol-lowing an apparently
routine neuraxial block. An epidural hematoma or abscess must be ruled out.
Either nerve roots or spinal cord may be injured. The latter may be avoided if
the neuraxial blockade is performed below the termination of the conus (L1 in
adults and L3 in children). Postoperative peripheral neuropathies can be due to
direct physi-cal trauma to nerve roots. Although most resolve spontaneously,
some are permanent. Some of these deficits have been associated with
paresthesia from the needle or catheter or complaints of pain during injection.
Some studies have suggested that multiple attempts during a technically
difficult block are also a risk factor. Any sustained paresthesia should alert
the clinician to redirect the needle. Injections should be immediately stopped
and the needle withdrawn, if they are associated with pain. Direct injection
into the spinal cord can cause paraplegia. Damage to the conus medullaris may
cause isolated sacral nerve dysfunction, including paralysis of the biceps
femoris muscles; anesthesia in the posterior thigh, saddle area, or great toes;
and loss of bowel or blad-der function. Not all neurological deficits
occur-ring after a regional anesthetic are the result of the block. Surveys of
complications have reported many instances of postoperative neurological
deficits that were attributed to regional anesthesia when, in fact, only
general anesthesia was used. Postpartum defi-cits, including lateral femoral
cutaneous neuropathy, foot drop, and paraplegia, were recognized before the
modern era of anesthesia and still occur in the absence of anesthetics. Less
clear are the postanes-thetic cases complicated by concurrent conditions such
as atherosclerosis, diabetes mellitus, interver-tebral disk disease, and spinal
disorders.
Needle or catheter trauma to epidural veins often causes minor bleeding
in the spinal canal, although this usually has no consequences. A clinically
sig-nificant spinal hematoma can occur following spinal or epidural anesthesia,
particularly in the presence of abnormal coagulation or a bleeding disorder.
The incidence of such hematomas has been estimated to be about 1:150,000 for
epidural blocks and 1:220,000 for spinal anesthetics. The vast majority of
reported cases have occurred in patients with abnormal coag-ulation either
secondary to disease or pharmaco-logical therapies. Many hematomas have
occurred immediately after removal of an epidural catheter. Thus, insertion and
removal of an epidural catheter are risk factors.
The pathological insult to the spinal cord
and nerves is due to the hematoma’s mass effect, com-pressing neural tissue and
causing direct pressure injury and ischemia. The diagnosis and treatment must
be accomplished promptly, if permanent neu-rological sequelae are to be
avoided. The onset of symptoms is typically more sudden than with epi-dural
abscess. Symptoms
include sharp back andleg pain with a motor weakness and/or sphincter
dysfunction. When hematoma is suspected, neuro-logical
imaging (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] or computed tomography [CT]) and
neurosurgical consultation must be obtained immediately. In many cases, good
neurological recovery has occurred in patients who have undergone surgical
decompres-sion within 8–12 hr.
Neuraxial anesthesia should be avoided in
patients with coagulopathy, significant thrombo-cytopenia, platelet
dysfunction, or those who have received fibrinolytic/thrombolytic therapy.
Practice guidelines should be reviewed when considering neuraxial anesthesia in
such patients, and the risk versus benefit of these techniques should be
weighed and delineated in the informed consent process.
Infection of the subarachnoid space can follow neuraxial blocks as the
result of contamination of the equipment or injected solutions, or as a result of
organisms tracked in from the skin. Indwelling catheters may become colonized
with organisms that then track deep, causing infection. Fortunately, these are
rare occurrences.
Arachnoiditis, another reported rare
complica-tion of neuraxial anesthesia, may be infectious or non-infectious.
Clinically, it is marked by pain and other neurological symptoms, and, on
radiographic imag-ing, is seen as a clumping of the nerve roots. Cases of
arachnoiditis have been traced to detergent in a spinal procaine preparation.
Lumbar arachnoiditis has been reported from subarachnoid steroid injection, but
is more commonly seen following spinal surgery or trauma. Prior to of the wide
availability of single-use disposable spinal anesthesia trays, caustic
solutions used to clean reusable spinal needles caused chemi-cal meningitis and
severe neurological dysfunction. Strict sterile technique should be employed,
and face masks should be worn by all individuals in the room where neuraxial
blocks are to be placed. Careful attention is particularly warranted in the
labor room where family members are often curious to see what is being done to
mitigate the parturient’s pain. Such individuals should be advised to avoid
contaminating the tray, if hospital policy permits their presence dur-ing
epidural placement. If permitted, family members should also wear a mask to
prevent contamination of the epidural tray with oral flora.
Spinal epidural abscess (EA) is a rare but
potentially devastating complication of neuraxial anesthesia.
The reported incidence varies widely, from
1:6500 to 1:500,000 epidurals. EA can occur in patients who did not receive
regional anesthesia; risk factors in such cases include back trauma, injecting
drug use, and neurosurgical procedures. Most reported anesthesia-related cases
involve epidural cath-eters. In one reported series, there was a mean of 5 days
from catheter insertion to the development of symptoms, although presentation
can be delayed for weeks.
There are four classic clinical stages of EA,
although progression and time course can vary. Initially, symptoms include back
or vertebral pain that is intensified by percussion over the spine. Second,
nerve root or radicular pain develops. The third stage is marked by motor
and/or sensory deficits or sphincter dysfunction. Paraplegia or paralysis marks
the fourth stage. Ideally, the diag-nosis is made in the early stages.
Prognosis has con-sistently been shown to correlate to the degree of
neurological dysfunction at the time the diagnosis is made. Back pain and fever
after epidural anes-thesia should alert the clinician to consider EA. Radicular
pain or neurological deficit heightens the urgency to investigate. Once EA is
suspected, the catheter should be removed (if still present) and the tip
cultured. The injection site is examined for evidence of infection; if pus is
expressed, it is sent for culture. Blood cultures should be obtained. If
suspicion is high and cultures have been obtained, anti-Staphylococcus coverage can be instituted, as the most common
organisms causing EA are Staphylococcus
aureus and Staphylococcus
epidermi-dis. MRI or CT scanning should be performed toconfirm or rule out
the diagnosis. Early neurosurgi-cal and infectious disease consultation is
advisable. In addition to antibiotics, treatment of EA usually involves
decompression (laminectomy), although percutaneous drainage with fluoroscopic
or CT guidance has been reported. There are a few reports of patients with no
neurological signs being treated with antibiotics alone.Suggested strategies
for guarding against the occurrence of EA include (1) minimizing catheter
manipulations and maintaining a closed system when possible; (2) using a
micropore (0.22-μm) bac-terial filter;
and (3) removing an epidural catheter or at least changing the catheter,
filter, and solution after a defined time interval (eg, some clinicians replace
or remove all epidurals after 4 days).
There is a risk of neuraxial catheters sheering and breaking off inside of
tissues if they are withdrawn through the needle. If a catheter must be
with-drawn while the needle remains in situ, both must be carefully withdrawn together. If a catheter breaks off
within the epidural space, many experts suggest leaving it and observing the
patient. If, however, the breakage occurs in superficial tissues, the catheter
should be surgically removed.
Related Topics
Privacy Policy, Terms and Conditions, DMCA Policy and Compliant
Copyright © 2018-2023 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.