Political Organisation: Pre-Mauryan
The spread of Aryans in the east led to the
establishment of new settlements in the Gangetic region. One important result
of introduction of iron tools was the easy removal of dense forest cover from
the banks of the Ganges. Sedentary agriculture had resulted in a permanent
settlement of a clan in a particular area, thereby giving it a geographical
identity. Retaining their acquired land required political organisation. The
emergence of gana-sangha , chiefdom,
has to be seen in this context. The
clusters where particular clansmen were dominant came to be known as janapadas.
There were two distinct forms of government at the
time of Mahavira and Buddha: monarchical kingdom and clan oligarchies or Gana-sanghas. The Gana- sanghas provided
a polity alternative to the kingdoms. Vedic rituals and the rules of varna were not followed. The
Gana-sanghas consisted of either a single clan, such as the Shakyas, Koliyas
and Mallas, or a confederacy of clans, such as the Vrijjis and the Vrishnis (a
confederacy located at Vaisali). The Gana-sanghas had only two strata: the
Kshatriya rajakula, ruling families, and the dasa-karmakara, the slaves and
labourers. The dasa-karmakaras had no representation in the Assembly. The
presence of various other popular religious cults in Gana-sanghas is in
contrast to the socio-cultural system prevailing in kingdoms.
In Gana -sanghas, the head of the clan presided
over the Assembly, comprising the heads of families. The clan’s head was not
chosen following heredity. This Assembly discussed the matters relating to the
affairs of the Gana-sanghas and if a unanimous decision was not possible, it
was put to vote. There were advisers to the head of the clan. In later days,
elaborate judicial procedures also evolved. The income of the Gana -sanghas was
drawn from agriculture and cattle rearing, which was confined only to the
Punjab and the doab, and to some
extent from trade. For the chieftains
of the north-west, the income primarily came from trade. Land was owned in
common by the clan. They were cultivated by dasa-karmakara. There was only
domestic slavery. The use of slaves in production was absent.
Related Topics
Privacy Policy, Terms and Conditions, DMCA Policy and Compliant
Copyright © 2018-2023 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.