One of the most effective ways to think about optimization is to visualize how a system’s response changes when we increase or decrease the levels of one or more of its factors.

**Response Surfaces**

One of the most effective ways to think
about optimization is to visualize how a sys- tem’s response changes when
we increase or decrease the
levels of one
or more of its
factors. A plot of the system’s response
as a function of the factor levels
is called a **response surface. **The simplest response surface is for
a system with
only one fac- tor. In this case the response
surface is a straight or curved line in two dimensions.
A calibration curve,
such as that
shown in Figure
14.1, is an example of a one-factor response surface
in which the response (absorbance) is plotted on the *y*-axis versus the factor level (concentration of analyte) on the *x*-axis. Response
surfaces can also be
expressed mathematically.

The
response surface in Figure 14.1,
for example, is

*A *= 0.008 + 0.0896*C*_{A}

where *A *is the
absorbance, and *C*_{A} is the analyte’s concentration in parts
per million.

For a two-factor system, such as the quantitative analysis for vanadium
described earlier, the
response surface is a flat
or curved plane
plotted in three
dimen- sions. For example,
Figure 14.2a shows the response
surface for a system obeying the equation

*R *= 3.0 – 0.30*A *+ 0.020*AB*

where *R *is the
response, and *A *and
*B
*are the factor
levels. Alternatively, we may
represent a two-factor response surface
as a contour plot, in which contour
lines in- dicate the
magnitude of the
response (Figure 14.2b).

The response surfaces
in Figure 14.2 are plotted
for a limited range of factor
levels (0 =< *A *=< 10, 0 =<
*B
*=< 10), but can be extended toward
more positive or more
negative values. This is an example of an unconstrained response surface. Most re-
sponse surfaces of interest to analytical chemists, however, are naturally constrained by the nature
of the factors
or the response or are constrained by practical limits
set by the analyst. The response surface
in Figure 14.1,
for example, has
a natural con- straint on its factor
since the smallest
possible concentration for the analyte
is zero. Furthermore, an upper limit
exists because it is usually
undesirable to extrapolate a calibration curve beyond
the highest concentration standard.

If the equation
for the response
surface is known,
then the optimum
response is easy to locate. Unfortunately, the response surface
is usually unknown;
instead, its shape, and the location
of the optimum response must be determined experimen- tally. The focus of this section is on useful experimental designs
for optimizing ana- lytical methods. These experimental designs are divided
into two broad
categories: searching methods, in which an algorithm guides
a systematic search
for the opti- mum response; and modeling
methods, in which we use a theoretical or empirical model of the response surface to predict
the optimum response.

Study Material, Lecturing Notes, Assignment, Reference, Wiki description explanation, brief detail

Modern Analytical Chemistry: Developing a Standard Method : Optimizing the Experimental Procedure: Response Surfaces |

**Related Topics **

Privacy Policy, Terms and Conditions, DMCA Policy and Compliant

Copyright © 2018-2024 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.