In the two-sample collaborative test, each analyst performs a single determination on two separate samples.

**Collaborative Testing and Analysis of Variance**

In the two-sample collaborative test, each
analyst performs a single determina- tion on two separate
samples. The resulting
data are reduced
to a set of differ- ences, *D, *and a set of totals,
*T, *each characterized by a mean value and a stan- dard deviation. Extracting values for random errors affecting precision and systematic differences between analysts is relatively straightforward for this ex- perimental design.

An alternative approach
for collaborative testing
is to have each analyst
per- form several replicate determinations on a single, common
sample. This approach generates a separate data set for each analyst,
requiring a different statistical treat-
ment to arrive at estimates
for σ_{rand} and σ_{sys}.

A variety of statistical methods
may be used
to compare three
or more sets
of data. The most
commonly used method
is an **analysis of variance **(ANOVA). In its simplest form,
a one-way ANOVA
allows the importance of a single
variable, such as the identity of the analyst,
to be determined. The importance of this variable
is evaluated by comparing its variance with the variance
explained by indeterminate sources of error inherent
to the analytical method.

Variance was introduced as one measure of a data set’s spread around its central tendency.
In the context of an analysis of variance, it is useful to
see that variance is simply
a ratio of the sum of squares
for the differences between individual values and their mean, to the degrees of freedom. For example, the vari-
ance, *s*2, of a data set consisting of *n *measurements is given as

where *X _{i} *is
the value of a single measurement, and

Let’s use a simple example
to develop the rationale behind
a one-way ANOVA calculation. The data in Table 14.7
show the results
obtained by several
analysts in de- termining the purity of a single
pharmaceutical preparation of sulfanilamide. Each column in this table
lists the results
obtained by an individual analyst.
For conve- nience, entries
in the table
are represented by the symbol
*X _{ij}, *where

One way to view the data in Table 14.7 is to treat it as a
single system, charac-terized by a global mean, *X**–**, *and a global variance, *s ^{2’}’ *. These parameters are
calcu-
lated using the following equations.

where *h *is the
total number of samples (in
this case the
number of analysts), *n _{i} *is the number of replicates for the

A second way
to work with
the data in Table 14.7
is to treat the results
for each analyst separately. Because the repeatability for any analyst
is influenced by indeter-
minate errors, the variance, *s _{w}*2, of the data in each column provides
an estimate of σ

w |

*s _{w}*2 ), is calculated by summing the squares of the differences between the replicates for each sample and that sample’s
mean, and dividing by the degrees of freedom.

Finally, the data for each analyst can be reduced to separate
mean values, *X**–** _{i}*.

The variance of the individual means about the global mean is called the between- sample variance, *s _{b}*2, and is calculated as

where *n _{i} *is the number
of replicates for the

where *n*– is approximated as the average number of replicates per analyst.

In a one-way ANOVA of the data in
Table 14.7, the null hypothesis is that no significant differences exist
between the mean values for each analyst. The alterna- tive hypothesis is that
at least one of the means is significantly different. If the null hypothesis is
true, then σ^{2}_{sys} must be zero. Thus, from equations 14.22
and 14.24 both s_{w}^{2} and s_{b}^{2} are
predictors of σ^{2}_{rand} and should have similar values. If s_{b}^{2}
is signifi- cantly greater than s_{w}^{2}, then σ^{2}_{sys}
is greater than zero. In this case the alternative hy-pothesis must be
accepted, and a significant difference between the means for the analysts has
been demonstrated. The test statistic is the F-ratio

which is compared with the critical
value F(α, h – 1, N – h). This is a one-tailed signifi- cance test because we
are only interested in whether s_{b}^{2} is significantly
greater than s_{w}^{2}.

Both s_{b}^{2} and s_{w}^{2}
are easy to determine for small data sets. For larger data sets, however,
calculating s_{w}^{2} becomes tedious.* Its calculation is
simplified by taking advantage of the relationship between the sum-of-squares
terms for the global variance, the within-sample variance, and the
between-sample variance. The numerator of equation 14.21, which also is known
as the total sum of squares, SS_{t}, can be split into two terms

SS_{t} = SS_{w} + SS_{b}

where the sum of squares for the variation within the sample, SS_{w},
is the numerator of equation 14.22, and the sum of squares between the sample,
SS_{b}, is the numera- tor of equation 14.23. Calculating SS_{t}
and SS_{b} gives SSw by difference. Dividing SSw and SS_{b} by
their respective degrees of freedom gives s_{w}^{2} and s_{w}^{2}.
Table 14.8 summa- rizes all the necessary equations for a one-way ANOVA
calculation. The application of a one-way ANOVA is outlined in Example 14.9.

Once a significant difference has been demonstrated by an analysis
of variance, a modified version of the
*t*-test, known as **Fisher’s least
significant difference, **can be used to determine which analyst or analysts are responsible for the difference.

The test statistic for comparing the mean values *X**–*_{1} and *X**–*_{2} is the *t*-test, except that *s*_{pool} is replaced by the square
root of the within-sample vari- ance obtained from an analysis of variance.

This value of *t*_{exp} is compared with the critical
value for *t*(α, v), where the signifi-
cance level is the same as that used in the ANOVA
calculation, and the degrees of freedom is the same as that for the within-sample variance. Because we are inter-
ested in whether the larger of the two means is significantly greater than the other
mean, the value of *t*(α, v) is that for a one-tail significance test.

An analysis of variance can be extended
to systems involving more than a single
variable. For example, a two-way
ANOVA can be used in a collaborative study to determine the importance to an analytical method of both the analyst
and the in- strumentation used. The treatment
of multivariable ANOVA is beyond the scope of
this text.

Study Material, Lecturing Notes, Assignment, Reference, Wiki description explanation, brief detail

Modern Analytical Chemistry: Developing a Standard Method : Collaborative Testing and Analysis of Variance |

**Related Topics **

Privacy Policy, Terms and Conditions, DMCA Policy and Compliant

Copyright © 2018-2024 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.