Metabolic determinants of
lipoprotein metabolism
The metabolism of serum lipoproteins and fate of their transport
lipids is controlled by:
● the physical and chemical characteristics of the lipoprotein,
such as its size and lipid and apopro-tein content
● the activity of the endothelial LPL and hepatic lipase (HL), so
called because they are attached to the surface of endothelial cells lining
blood vessels in peripheral tissues, such as adipose tissue and skeletal
muscle, and the liver, respectively
● lipid transfer proteins; cholesteryl ester and phos-pholipid
transfer proteins, (CETP and PLTP respectively).
● apoproteins that act as activators of enzymes and ligands for
specific lipoprotein receptors on the sur-faces of cells (apoB-100 and apoE as
ligands for the LDLs and remnant receptors in the liver, respectively)
● the activity of specific lipoprotein receptors on cell surfaces.
Lipoprotein transport is traditionally described in terms of the
forward and reverse transport of choles-terol. Forward transport encompasses
the exogenous and endogenous pathways, which describes the arrival of
cholesterol in the blood from either the gut or the liver and carriage back to
the liver for processing; the liver has the unique capacity to secrete
cholesterol either as free cholesterol or as bile acids. Conversely, reverse
transport describes the HDL pathway and the efflux of cholesterol out of
peripheral tissues back to the liver. This directionality can be misleading
because each pathway can direct cholesterol back to the liver. Both the
exogenous and endogenous pathways share a common saturable lipolytic pathway
that consists of a delipidation cascade in which the TAG-rich lipopro-teins
(chylomicrons and VLDLs), after receiving apo-C (C-II) from HDL, an essential
cofactor for the activation of LPL, are progressively depleted of their TAG in
a stepwise fashion by LPL to become choles-terol-rich remnants that are removed
by specific, high-affinity receptors found chiefly in the liver. Several
molecules of LPL may bind to a single chylo-micron or VLDL particle, although
LPL shows greater affinity for chylomicrons in preference to VLDL. This
situation leads to competition between these TAG-rich lipoproteins and provides
a mechanism to explain how VLDL can influence the clearance of TAG in the
postprandial period.
Whether a VLDL particle is removed as a remnant or transcends to
LDL largely depends on its pedigree, i.e., its size and lipid composition.
Experiments with radioactively labeled VLDL have shown that larger, TAG-rich
VLDL particles are less likely to be con-verted into LDL and are removed as
partially delipi-dated VLDL remnants, whereas smaller VLDLs are precursors of
LDL.
Related Topics
Privacy Policy, Terms and Conditions, DMCA Policy and Compliant
Copyright © 2018-2023 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.