Prebypass Period
Following induction and intubation, the
anesthetic course is typically characterized by an initial period of minimal
stimulation (skin preparation and drap-ing) that is frequently associated with
hypotension, followed by discrete periods of intense stimulation that can
produce tachycardia and hypertension. These periods of stimulation include the
skin inci-sion, sternotomy and sternal retraction, opening the pericardium,
and, sometimes, aortic dissection. The anesthetic agent should be adjusted
appropriately in anticipation of these events.
Accentuated vagal responses resulting in
marked bradycardia and hypotension may occa-sionally be seen during sternal
retraction or open-ing of the pericardium, perhaps more commonly in patients
who have been taking β-adrenergic block-ing agents or
diltiazem.
Myocardial ischemia in the prebypass
period is not always associated with hemodynamic per-turbations such as
tachycardia, hypertension, or hypotension. Prophylactic infusion of
nitroglycerin (1–2 mcg/kg/min) has been studied many times and continues to be
used but does not appear to reduce the incidence of ischemic episodes or to
alter outcomes.
Anticoagulation must be established
before CPB to prevent acute disseminated intravascular coagulation and
formation of clots in the CPB pump. In most centers the adequacy of
anticoagula-tion will be confirmed by measuring the ACT. An ACT longer than
400–480 s is considered adequate at most centers. Heparin, 300–400 units/kg, is
usu-ally given while the aortic pursestring sutures are placed before
cannulation. Some surgeons prefer to administer the heparin themselves directly
into the right atrium. If heparin is administered by the anesthesiologist, it
should be given through a reli-able (usually central) intravenous line, and the
ACT should be measured 3–5 min later. If the ACT is less than 400 s, additional
heparin (100 units/kg) is given. Some drugs (eg, aprotinin) prolong the
celite-activated ACT but not the kaolin-activated ACT; the kaolin-ACT should be
used to assess ade-quacy of anticoagulation in these circumstances. Heparin
concentration assays (see Reversal of Anticoagulation, below) measure heparin
levels and not necessarily effect; these assays are therefore not reliable for
measuring the degree of anticoagulation but can be used as an adjunct. A whole
blood hepa-rin concentration of 3–4 units/mL is usually suffi-cient for CPB.
The high-dose thrombin time (HiTT) is not influenced by aprotinin but is more
compli-cated to perform than a kaolin-ACT. HiTT cannot provide a preheparin
control and does not provide an index for the adequacy of reversal with
protamine .
Resistance to heparin is occasionally
encoun-tered; many such patients have antithrombin III deficiency (acquired or
congenital). Antithrombin is a circulating serine protease that irreversibly
binds and inactivates thrombin (as well as the acti-vated forms of factors X,
XI, XII, and XIII). When heparin complexes with antithrombin III, the
anti-coagulant activity of antithrombin III is enhanced 1000-fold. Patients
with antithrombin III deficiency will achieve adequate anticoagulation
following infusion of 2 units of fresh frozen plasma or anti-thrombin III
concentrate. Alternatively, recombi-nant human antithrombin III may be
administered. Milder forms of heparin resistance can be managed by
administration of a modestly larger than normal dose of heparin.
Patients with a history of
heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) require special consider-ation. These
patients produce heparin-dependent (platelet factor 4) antibodies that
agglutinate plate-lets and produce thrombocytopenia, sometimes associated with
thromboembolism. If the history of HIT is remote and antibodies can no longer
be demonstrated, heparin may safely used for CPB. Other anticoagulants should
be preferred in other circumstances. When significant antibody titers are
detected, alternative anticoagulants including hirudin, bivalirudin, ancrod,
and argatroban may be considered, but experience with them is limited.
Consultation with a hematologist may be helpful.
Bleeding prophylaxis with
antifibrinolytic agents may be initiated before or after anticoagulation. Some
clinicians prefer to administer antifibrinolytic agents after heparinization to
reduce the possible incidence of thrombotic complications; others fear that
delayed administration may reduce antifibrinolytic efficacy. Antifi brinolytic
therapy may be particularly useful for patients who are undergoing a repeat
operation; who refuse blood products (such as Jehovah’s Witnesses); who are at
high risk for postoperative bleeding because of recent admin-istration of
glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (abcix-imab [RheoPro], eptifibatide
[Integrilin], or tirofiban [Aggrastat]); who have preexisting coagulopathy; and
who are undergoing long and complicated pro-cedures involving the heart or
aorta. The antiplatelet effect of abciximab typically lasts 24–48 h; those of
eptifibatide and tirofiban are 2–4 and 4–8 h, respec-tively. The combination of
aspirin and the adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist clopidogrel (Plavix)
is also associated with excessive bleeding.
The antifibrinolytic agents currently
avail-able, ε-aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid, do not
affect the ACT and only rarely induce allergic reactions. ε-Aminocaproic
acid is usually adminis-tered as a 50–75 mg/kg loading dose followed by a 20–25
mg/kg/h maintenance infusion (some clini-cians use a standard 5–10 g loading
dose followed by 1 g/h). Tranexamic acid is often dosed at 10 mg/kg followed by
1 mg/kg/h, although pharmacokinetic studies suggest that larger doses may more
reliably maintain effective blood concentrations. Intra-operative collection of
platelet-rich plasma by pheresis prior to CPB is employed by some centers;
reinfusion following bypass may decrease bleeding and reduce transfusion
requirements.
Placement of venous and arterial
cannulas for CPB is a critical time. After
heparinization, aortic cannulation is usually done first because of the
hemodynamic problems frequently associated with venous cannulation and to allow
convenient and rapid transfusion from the pump oxygenator. The inflow cannula
is most often placed in the ascend-ing aorta. The small opening of most
arterial cannu-las produces a jet stream that, when not positioned properly,
can cause aortic dissection or preferential flow of blood to the innominate
artery. The sys-temic arterial pressure is customarily reduced to 90–100 mm Hg
systolic during placement of the aortic cannula to reduce the likelihood of
dissection. Air bubbles should be absent from the arterial can-nula and inflow
line, and adequacy of the connection between the arterial inflow line and the
patient must be demonstrated before bypass is initiated. Failure to remove all
air bubbles will result in air emboli, possibly into the coronary or cerebral
circulations, whereas failure to enter the aorta may result in aor-tic
dissection. Some clinicians routinely hand com-press the carotid arteries
during aortic cannulation to decrease the likelihood of cerebral emboli, but
the efficacy of this technique is doubtful.
One or two venous cannulas are placed in
the right atrium, usually through the right atrial appendage. One cannula is
usually adequate for most coronary artery bypass and aortic valve opera-tions.
The single cannula used often has two por-tals (two-stage); when it is properly
positioned, one opening is in the right atrium and the other is in the inferior
vena cava.
Separate cannulas in the superior and
inferior venae cavae are used for open-heart procedures.Hypotension from
impaired ventricular filling may occur during manipulation of the venaecavae
and the heart. Venous cannulation also fre-quently precipitates atrial or, less
commonly, ventric-ular arrhythmias. Premature atrial contractions and transient
bursts of a supraventricular tachycardia are common. Sustained paroxysmal
atrial tachycardia or atrial fibrillation frequently leads to hemodynamic
deterioration, which may be treated pharmacologi-cally, electrically, or by
immediate initiation of bypass (provided that full anticoagulation has been
con-firmed). Malpositioning of the venous cannulas can interfere with venous
return or impede venous drainage from the head and neck (superior vena cava
syndrome). Upon initiation of CPB, the former is manifested as inadequate
volume in the venous res-ervoir, whereas the latter produces engorgement of the
head and neck. Under these circumstances, cen-tral venous pressure may not
increase if the tip of the central line is adjacent or very near the cannula.
Related Topics
Privacy Policy, Terms and Conditions, DMCA Policy and Compliant
Copyright © 2018-2023 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.