Pathophysiology of Pain
The sensory experience of pain depends on the interaction be-tween the nervous system and the environment. The processing of noxious stimuli and the resulting perception of pain involve the peripheral and central nervous systems.
Among the nerve mechanisms and structures involved in the transmission of pain perceptions to and from the area of the brain that interprets pain are nociceptors, or pain receptors, and chem-ical mediators. Nociceptors are receptors that are preferentially sensitive to a noxious stimulus. Nociceptors are also called pain receptors, but the former term is preferred.
Nociceptors are free nerve endings in the skin that respond only to intense, potentially damaging stimuli. Such stimuli may be me-chanical, thermal, or chemical in nature. The joints, skeletal mus-cle, fascia, tendons, and cornea also have nociceptors that have the potential to transmit stimuli that produce pain. However, the large internal organs (viscera) do not contain nerve endings that respond only to painful stimuli. Pain originating in these organs results from intense stimulation of receptors that have other pur-poses. For example, inflammation, stretching, ischemia, dilation, and spasm of the internal organs all cause an intense response in these multipurpose fibers and can cause severe pain.
Nociceptors are part of complex multidirectional pathways. These nerve fibers branch very near their origin in the skin and send fibers to local blood vessels, mast cells, hair follicles, and sweat glands. When these fibers are stimulated, histamine is re-leased from the mast cells, causing vasodilation. Nociceptors respond to high-intensity mechanical, thermal, and chemical stimuli. Some receptors respond to only one type of stimuli; others, called polymodal nociceptors, respond to all three types of stimuli. These highly specialized neurons transfer the mechani-cal, thermal, or chemical stimulus into electrical activity or action potentials.
The cutaneous fibers located more centrally further branch and communicate with the paravertebral sympathetic chain of the nervous system and with large internal organs. As a result of the connections between these nerve fibers, pain is often accom-panied by vasomotor, autonomic, and visceral effects. In a patient with severe acute pain, for example, gastrointestinal peristalsis may decrease or stop.
A number of algogenic (pain-causing) substances that affect the sensitivity of nociceptors are released into the extracellular tissue as a result of tissue damage. Histamine, bradykinin, acetylcholine, serotonin, and substance P are chemicals that increase the trans-mission of pain. The transmission of pain is also referred to as nociception. Prostaglandins are chemical substances thought toincrease the sensitivity of pain receptors by enhancing the pain-provoking effect of bradykinin. These chemical mediators also cause vasodilation and increased vascular permeability, resulting in redness, warmth, and swelling of the injured area.
Once nociception is initiated, the nociceptive action poten-tials are transmitted by the peripheral nervous system (Porth, 2002). The first-order neurons travel from the periphery (skin, cornea, visceral organs) to the spinal cord via the dorsal horn. There are two main types of fibers involved in the transmission of nociception. Smaller, myelinated Aδ (A delta) fibers transmit nociception rapidly, which produces the initial “fast pain.” Type C fibers are larger, unmyelinated fibers that transmit what is called second pain. This type of pain has dull, aching, or burning qualities that last longer than the initial fast pain. The type and concentration of nerve fibers to transmit pain vary by tissue type.
If there is repeated C fiber input, a greater response is noted in dorsal horn neurons, causing the person to perceive more pain. In other words, the same noxious stimulus produces hyperalge-sia, and the person reports greater pain than was felt at the first stimulus. For this reason, it is important to treat patients with analgesic agents when they first feel the pain. Patients require less medication and experience more effective pain relief if analgesia is administered before the patient becomes sensitized to the pain.
Chemicals that reduce or inhibit the transmission or perception of pain include endorphins and enkephalins. These morphine-like neurotransmitters are endogenous (produced by the body). They are examples of substances that reduce nociceptive trans-mission when applied to certain nerve fibers. The term “endor-phin” is a combination of two words: endogenous and morphine. Endorphins and enkephalins are found in heavy concentrations in the central nervous system, particularly the spinal and medullary dorsal horn, the periaqueductal gray matter, hypothalamus, and amygdala. Morphine and other opioid medications act at recep-tor sites to suppress the excitation initiated by noxious stimuli. The binding of opioids to receptor sites is responsible for the effects noted after their administration. Each receptor (mu, kappa, delta) responds differently when activated. Table 13-1 summarizes the classification and action of opioid receptors.
After tissue injury occurs, nociception (the neurologic transmis-sion of pain impulses) to the spinal cord via the Aδ and C fibers continues. The fibers enter the dorsal horn, which is divided into laminae based on cell type. The laminae II cell type is commonly referred to as the substantia gelatinosa. In the substantia gelati-nosa are projections that relay nociception to other parts of the spinal cord (Fig. 13-3).Nociception continues from the spinal cord to the reticular formation, thalamus, limbic system, and cerebral cortex. Here nociception is localized and its characteristics become apparent to the person, including the intensity. The involvement of the reticular formation, limbic, and reticular activating systems is re-sponsible for the individual variations in the perception of nox-ious stimuli. Individuals may report the same stimulus differently based on their anxiety, past experiences, and expectations. This is a result of the conscious perception of pain.
For pain to be consciously perceived, neurons in the ascend-ing system must be activated. Activation occurs as a result of input from the nociceptors located in the skin and internal or-gans. Once activated, the inhibitory interneuronal fibers in the dorsal horn inhibit or turn off the transmission of noxious stim-ulating information in the ascending pathway.
The descending control system is a system of fibers that originate in the lower and midportion of the brain (specifically the peri-aqueductal gray matter) and terminate on the inhibitory inter-neuronal fibers in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. This system is probably always somewhat active; it prevents continuous trans-mission of stimuli as painful, partly through the action of the en-dorphins. As nociception occurs, the descending control system is activated to inhibit pain.
Cognitive processes may stimulate endorphin production in the descending control system. The effectiveness of this system is illustrated by the effects of distraction. The distractions of visitors or a favorite TV show may increase activity in the descending control system. Therefore, the person who has visitors may not report pain because activation of the descending control system results in less noxious or painful information being transmitted to consciousness. Once the distraction by the visitors ends, activ-ity in the descending control system decreases, resulting in in-creased transmission of painful stimuli.
The interconnections between the descending neuronal sys-tem and the ascending sensory tract are called inhibitory inter-neuronal fibers. These fibers contain enkephalin and are primarily activated through the activity of non-nociceptor peripheral fibers (fibers that normally do not transmit painful or noxious stimuli) in the same receptor field as the pain receptor, and descending fibers, grouped together in a system called descending control. The enkephalins and endorphins are thought to inhibit pain im-pulses by stimulating the inhibitory interneuronal fibers, which in turn reduce the transmission of noxious impulses via the as-cending system (Puig & Montes, 1998).
The classic gate control theory of pain, described by Melzack and Wall in 1965, was the first to clearly articulate the existence of a pain-modulating system (Melzack, 1996). This theory pro-poses that stimulation of the skin evokes nervous impulses that are then transmitted by three systems located in the spinal cord. The substantia gelatinosa in the dorsal horn, the dorsal column fibers, and the central transmission cells act to influence nocicep-tive impulses. The noxious impulses are influenced by a “gating mechanism.” Melzack and Wall proposed that stimulation of the large-diameter fibers inhibits the transmission of pain, thus “clos-ing the gate.” Conversely, when smaller fibers are stimulated, the gate is opened. The gating mechanism is influenced by nerve impulses that descend from the brain. This theory proposes a spe-cialized system of large-diameter fibers that activate selective cog-nitive processes via the modulating properties of the spinal gate. Figure 13-4 shows a schematic representation of a gate control system and nociceptive pathways.
The gate control theory was important because it was the first theory to suggest that psychological factors play a role in the per-ception of pain. The theory guided research toward the cognitive-behavioral approaches to pain management. This theory helps to explain how interventions such as distraction and music therapy provide pain relief.
Melzack (1996) extended the gate control theory after care-fully analyzing phantom limb pain. He proposed that a large, widespread network of neurons exists that consists of loops be-tween the thalamus and cortex and between the cortex and the limbic system. Melzack labeled this network the neuromatrix.
As information is processed in the neuromatrix, a characteristic pat-tern emerges. This pattern, referred to as the neurosignature, is a continuous outflow from the neuromatrix. Ultimately, the neuro-signature output, with a constant stream of input and varying patterns, produces the feelings of the whole body with constantly changing qualities.
Melzack (1996) theorized that in the absence of modulating inputs from the missing limb, the active neuromatrix produces a neurosignature pattern that is perceived as pain. The neuro-matrix theory highlights the role of the brain in sustaining the experience of pain. Some researchers have criticized this theory as not adding to the understanding of how psychological factors influence pain (Keefe, Lefebvre & Starr, 1996). While the neuro-matrix theory might explain unusual pain phenomena, its con-tribution to understanding pain management remains to be seen.
Copyright © 2018-2020 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.