NONPHARMACOLOGIC
INTERVENTIONS
Although pain medication
is the most powerful pain relief tool available to nurses, it is not the only
one. Nonpharmacologic nursing activities can assist in relieving pain with
usually low risk to the patient. Although such measures are not a substitute
for medication, they may be all that is necessary or appropriate to re-lieve
episodes of pain lasting only seconds or minutes. In in-stances of severe pain
that lasts for hours or days, combining nonpharmacologic interventions with
medications may be the most effective way to relieve pain.
The gate control theory
of pain proposes that the stimulation of fibers that transmit nonpainful
sensations can block or decrease the transmission of pain impulses. Several
nonpharmacologic pain relief strategies, including rubbing the skin and using
heat and cold, are based on this theory.
Massage, which is generalized cutaneous stimulation of the body, often
concentrates on the back and shoulders. A massage does not specifically
stimulate the non-pain receptors in the same recep-tor field as the pain
receptors, but it may have an impact through the descending control system (see
earlier discussion). Massage also promotes comfort because it produces muscle
relaxation.
Ice and heat therapies may be effective pain relief strategies in some
circumstances; however, their effectiveness and mechanism of ac-tion need further
study. Proponents believe that ice and heat stim-ulate the non-pain receptors
in the same receptor field as the injury.
For greatest effect, ice should be placed on the injury site
im-mediately after injury or surgery. Ice therapy after joint surgery can
significantly reduce the amount of analgesic medication required subsequently.
Ice therapy may also relieve pain if applied later. Care must be taken to
assess the skin prior to treatment and to protect the skin from direct
application of the ice. Ice should be applied to an area for no longer than 20
minutes at a time. This prevents the rebound phenomenon that occurs as the body
attempts to warm up, rendering the treatment useless. Long applications of ice
may result in frostbite or nerve injury. Both ice and heat therapy must be
applied carefully and monitored closely to avoid injuring the skin. Neither
therapy should be applied to areas with impaired cir-culation or used with
patients with impaired sensation.
Application of heat
increases blood flow to an area and con-tributes to pain reduction by speeding
healing. Both dry and moist heat may provide some analgesia, but their
mechanisms of action are not well understood. Application of heat to inflamed
joints, for example, may provide temporary comfort, but increasing the
intra-articular temperature may impair healing (Oosterveld & Rasker, 1994a,
1994b).
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) uses a
battery-operated unit with electrodes applied to the skin to produce a
tingling, vibrating, or buzzing sensation in the area of pain. It hasbeen used
in both acute and chronic pain relief and is thought to decrease pain by
stimulating the non-pain receptors in the same area as the fibers that transmit
the pain. This mechanism is con-sistent with the gate control theory of pain
and explains the effec-tiveness of cutaneous stimulation when applied in the
same area as an injury. For example, when TENS is used in a postoperative
patient, the electrodes are placed around the surgical wound.
Another possible
explanation for the effectiveness of TENS is the placebo effect (the patient
expects it to be effective). In a re-view of the literature, Carroll, Tramer,
McQuay et al. (1996) found that in 15 of 17 studies with randomized control
group de-signs, TENS was ineffective in relieving postoperative pain. In 17 of
19 studies that did not use this design, the authors of these studies concluded
that TENS had a positive analgesic effect. The review of these studies suggests
that a placebo effect may explain the effectiveness of TENS.
Distraction helps relieve both acute and chronic pain (Johnson &
Petrie, 1997). Distraction, which involves focusing the patient’s at-tention on
something other than the pain, may be the mechanism responsible for other
effective cognitive techniques. Distraction is thought to reduce the perception
of pain by stimulating the de-scending control system, resulting in fewer
painful stimuli being transmitted to the brain. The effectiveness of
distraction depends on the patient’s ability to receive and create sensory
input other than pain. Distraction techniques may range from simple activities,
such as watching TV or listening to music, to highly complex physical and
mental exercises. Pain relief generally increases in direct pro-portion to the
person’s active participation, the number of sensory modalities used, and the
person’s interest in the stimuli. Therefore, the stimulation of sight, sound,
and touch is likely to be more ef-fective in reducing pain than is the
stimulation of a single sense.
Visits from family and friends are effective in relieving pain. Watching
an action-packed movie on a large screen with “Surround-Sound” through
headphones may be effective (provided the person finds it acceptable). Others
may benefit from games and activities (eg, chess) that require concentration.
Not all patients ob-tain pain relief with distraction, especially those in
severe pain. With severe pain, the patient may be unable to concentrate well
enough to participate in complex physical or mental activities.
Skeletal muscle relaxation is believed to reduce pain by relaxing tense
muscles that contribute to the pain. Considerable evidence supports relaxation
as effective in relieving chronic low back pain (NIH Technology Assessment
Panel, 1995). Few studies, however, support its effectiveness in reducing
postoperative pain. This may be due to the relatively small role skeletal
muscles play in postop-erative pain, or to the need for the patient to practice
the relaxation technique for it to be effective. Practicing the technique may
not be possible when it is taught only once, immediately before surgery. A
patient who already knows a technique for relaxing may only need to be reminded
to use it to reduce or prevent increased pain.
A simple relaxation technique consists of abdominal breath-ing at a
slow, rhythmic rate. The patient may close both eyes and breathe slowly and
comfortably. A constant rhythm can be main-tained by counting silently and
slowly with each inhalation (“in, two, three”) and exhalation (“out, two,
three”). When teaching this technique, the nurse may count out loud with the
patient at first. Slow, rhythmic breathing may also be used as a distraction technique.
Relaxation techniques, as well as other noninvasive pain relief measures, may
require practice before the patient be-comes skilled in using them.
Almost all people with
chronic pain can benefit from some method of relaxation. Regular relaxation periods
may help to com-bat the fatigue and muscle tension that occur with and increase
chronic pain.
Guided imagery is using
one’s imagination in a special way to achieve a specific positive effect.
Guided imagery for relaxation and pain relief may consist of combining slow,
rhythmic breath-ing with a mental image of relaxation and comfort. The nurse
in-structs the patient to close the eyes and breathe slowly in and out. With
each slowly exhaled breath, the patient imagines muscle tension and discomfort
being breathed out, carrying away pain and tension and leaving behind a relaxed
and comfortable body. With each inhaled breath, the patient imagines healing
energy flowing to the area of discomfort.
If guided imagery is to
be effective, it requires a considerable amount of time to explain the
technique and time for the patient to practice it. Usually, the patient is
asked to practice guided im-agery for about 5 minutes, three times a day.
Several days of prac-tice may be needed before the intensity of pain is
reduced. Many patients begin to experience the relaxing effects of guided
imagery the first time they try it. Pain relief can continue for hours after
the imagery is used. The patient needs to be informed that guided imagery may
work only for some people. Guided imagery should be used only in combination
with all other forms of treatment that have demonstrated effectiveness.
Hypnosis, which has been effective in relieving pain or decreas-ing the
amount of analgesic agents required in patients with acute and chronic pain,
may promote pain relief in particularly diffi-cult situations (eg, burns). The
mechanism by which hypnosis acts is unclear. Its effectiveness depends on the
hypnotic suscep-tibility of the individual (Farthing, Venturino, Brown et al.,
1997). In some cases, hypnosis may be effective in the first ses-sion, with
effectiveness increasing in additional sessions. In other cases, hypnosis does
not work at all. Usually, hypnosis must be induced by a specially skilled person
(a psychologist or a nurse with specialized training in hypnosis). Sometimes
patients learn to perform self-hypnosis.
Related Topics
Privacy Policy, Terms and Conditions, DMCA Policy and Compliant
Copyright © 2018-2023 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.