Several
factors in the development and marketing of drugs result in conflicts of
interest. Use of pharmaceutical industry funding to support FDA approval
processes raises the possibility of conflicts of interest within the FDA.
Supporters of this policy point out that chronic FDA underfunding by the
government allows for few alternatives. Another important source of conflicts
of interest is the dependence of the FDA on outside panels of experts that are
recruited from the scientific and clinical community to advise the government
agency on questions regarding drug approval or with-drawal. Such experts are
often recipients of grants from the com-panies producing the drugs in question.
The need for favorable data in the new drug application leads to phase 2 and 3
trials in which the new agent is compared only to placebo, not to older,
effective drugs. As a result, data regarding the efficacy and toxicity of the
new drug relative to a known effective
agent may not be avail-able when the new drug is first marketed.
Manufacturers
promoting a new agent may pay physicians to use it in preference to older drugs
with which they are more famil-iar. Manufacturers sponsor small and often
poorly designed clini-cal studies after marketing approval and aid in the
publication offavorable results but may retard publication of unfavorable
results. The need for physicians to meet continuing medical education (CME)
requirements in order to maintain their licenses encour-ages manufacturers to
sponsor conferences and courses, often in highly attractive vacation sites, and
new drugs are often featured in such courses. Recognition of the obvious
conflicts of interest is leading some clinical specialty organizations to
reject industry support of such conferences. Finally, the common practice of
dis-tributing free samples of new drugs to practicing physicians has both
positive and negative effects. The samples allow physicians to try out new
drugs without incurring any cost to the patient. On the other hand, new drugs
are usually much more expensive than older agents and when the free samples run
out, the patient (or insurance carrier) may be forced to pay much more for
treatment than if the older, cheaper, and possibly equally effective drug were
used. Finally, when the patent for a drug is nearing expiration, the
patent-holding manufacturer may try to extend its exclusive mar-keting
privilege by paying generic manufacturers to not introduce a generic version (“pay to delay”).
Unfortunately,
the rate of introduction of new drugs has fallen during the last two decades.
This has raised concerns about our ability to deal with the increasing
prevalence of resistant microor-ganisms, and the problems of degenerative
diseases in an aging population. In an effort to facilitate this process, the
National Institutes of Health are currently (2011) considering the
establish-ment of a new institute specializing in translational research.
An
adverse drug event (ADE) or reaction to a drug (ADR) is a harmful or unintended
response. Adverse drug reactions are claimed to be the fourth leading cause of
death, higher than pul-monary disease, AIDS, accidents, and automobile deaths.
The FDA has further estimated that 300,000 preventable adverse events occur in
hospitals, many as a result of confusing medical informa-tion or lack of
information (for example, regarding drug incompat-ibilities). Some adverse
reactions, such as overdose, excessive effects, and drug interactions, may
occur in anyone. Adverse reactions occurring only in susceptible patients
include intolerance, idiosyn-crasy (frequently genetic in origin), and allergy
(usually immuno-logically mediated). During IND studies and clinical trials
before FDA approval, all adverse events (serious, life-threatening, dis-abling,
reasonably drug related, or unexpected) must be reported. After FDA approval to
market a drug, surveillance, evaluation, and reporting must continue for any
adverse events that are related to use of the drug, including overdose,
accident, failure of expected action, events occurring from drug withdrawal,
and unexpected events not listed in labeling. Events that are both serious and
unex-pected must be reported to the FDA within 15 days. In 2008, the FDA began
publishing quarterly a list of drugs being investigated for potential safety
risks. The ability to predict and avoid adverse drug reactions and optimize a
drug’s therapeutic index is an increasing focus of pharmacogenetic and
personalized medicine. It is hoped that greater use of electronic health
records will reduce some of these risks .
Related Topics
Privacy Policy, Terms and Conditions, DMCA Policy and Compliant
Copyright © 2018-2023 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.