Problems with Orgasm
The
attainment of reasonably regular orgasms with a partner is a crucial personal
developmental step for young women. This task of adult sexual development rests
upon a subtle interplay of physiology, individual psychology and culture.
Reliable orgasmic attainment is usually highly
valued by the woman and is often reflected in enhanced self-esteem, confidence
in her femininity, relationship satisfaction and the motive to continue to
behave sexually.
Orgasm is the reflexive culmination of arousal. It is mani-fested by
rhythmic vaginal wall contractions and the release of muscular tension and
pelvic vasocongestion, accompanied by varying degrees of pleasurable body
sensations. Its accomplish-ment requires: 1) the physiologic apparatus to
augment and sus-tain arousal; 2) the psychological willingness to be swept away
by excitement; and 3) tenacious focus on the required physical work of
augmenting arousal. The diagnosis of female orgasmic disor-der (FOD) is made
when the woman’s psychology persistently interferes with her body’s natural
progression through arousal.
Estimates
of prevalence of both lifelong and acquired psy-chological FOD range from 10 to
30% (Laumann et al., 1994b). Some of this variability is due to the
different definitions of anor-gasmia. It remains a difficult scientific
judgment, however, where to draw the line between dysfunction and normality,
for example, is it normal to attain orgasms during one-third of partner sexual
experiences? (Tiefer, 1998). Few women are always orgasmic.
During most of the 20th century, psychoanalysts thought that almost 90%
of women were orgasmically dysfunctional. Prior to 1970, the accepted concept
of normality required a woman to be brought to orgasm by penile thrusting.
Orgasmic fulfillment through solitary masturbation or partner manual or oral
stimula-tion was viewed as signifying the presence of a neurotic obstacle to
mature femininity. This paternalistic idea has weakened con-siderably in the
last generation.
The biologic potential for orgasmic attainment is an in-born endowment
of nearly all physically healthy women. The cultural and psychological factors
that influence orgasmic attain-ment are usually fundamental to the etiology of
FOD. Centuries-old beliefs that sexual knowledge, behavior and sexual pleasure
were not the prerogative of “good girls” powerfully affects some women’s sexual
adjustment. These beliefs cause young women to be uninformed about the location
and role of their clitoris and ashamed of their erotic desires and sexual
sensations. For women with FOD, modern concepts of equality of sexual
expression are insufficient to overcome these traditional beliefs. These
emotion-ally powerful beliefs often lay behind their classic dysfunctional
pattern: the women can become aroused to a personal plateau beyond which they
cannot progress; thereafter, their excitement dissipates. After numerous
repetitions, they begin to lose motiva-tion to participate in sex with their
partner. They may eventually meet criteria for HSDD.
The doctor should know the answers to the following questions. Does the
patient have orgasms under any of the following sex-ual circumstances: solitary
masturbation, partner manual geni-tal stimulation, oral–genital stimulation,
vibratory stimulation, any other means? Does she have orgasms with a partner
differ-ent from her significant other? How are they stimulated? Does a
particular fantasy make orgasmic attainment easier or possible? Under what
conditions has she ever been orgasmic? Has she had an orgasm during her sleep?
The
lifelong generalized variety
of the disorder is recognized when a woman has never been able to attain orgasm
alone or with a partner by any means, although she regularly is aroused. When a
woman can only readily attain orgasm during masturbation, she is diagnosed as having a lifelong situational type. Women with any form of lifelong FOD more clearly
have conflicts about personal sexual expression due to fear, guilt, ignorance,
or obedi-ence to tradition than those with the acquired variety. Women who can
masturbate to orgasm often feel fear and embarrassment about sharing their
private arousal with any other person.
The acquired varieties of this disorder are more common and are
characterized by both complete anorgasmia, too-infrequent orgasms and
too-difficult orgasmic attainment. The most com-mon cause of this problem are
serotonergic compounds. Pro-spective studies of various antidepressants have
demonstrated up to 70% incidence of this disorder among those treated with
serotonergic antidepressants. Bupropion and nefazadone do not cause this
problem. When medications are not the cause of an acquired FOD, the doctor
needs carefully to assess the meaning of the changes in her life prior to the
onset of the disorder. Some of these women are in the midst of making a
transition to a new partner after many years in another relationship. Some seem
to suffer from memories of earlier shame-ridden behaviors such as incest.
When a doctor applies a label of disorder to a relatively anorgas-mic
woman, the woman often privately interprets the diagnosis as meaning that she
has a serious and difficult problem to overcome. Physicians need to be careful
about this because some of these women are relatively easy to help. It must be
realized that many women gradually undo the effects of their culture on their
own and grow to be increasingly responsive sexually with time and growing trust
of their partners. Clinicians can do many women a great service by offering education
and reassurance. Giving an inhibited woman new-to-her information in an
encouraging man-ner can subdue her anxiety and foster her optimism. On the
other hand, some women with this disorder are profoundly entrenched in not
being too excited and treatments fail. The ideal era to begin treatment is
young adulthood.
Four formats are known to be of help. Individual therapy is the most
commonly employed. In lifelong varieties of the dis-order, therapy focuses on
the cultural sources of sexual inhibition and how and when they impacted upon
the patient. In the situ-ational varieties, the therapist focuses on the
meaning of the life changes that preceded the onset of the disorder. Group
therapy is highly effective in helping women reliably to masturbate to orgasm
and moderately effective in overcoming partner inhibi-tion. It is typically
done with college and graduate students in campus settings, not older women.
Couple therapy may be useful to assist the couple with the subtleties of their
sexual equilibrium. The personal and interpersonal dimensions of orgasmic
attain-ment can be stressed. Often other issues then come to the fore that
initially seemed to have little to do with orgasmic attain-ment. The most
cost-effective treatment is bibliotherapy. Female orgasmic attainment has been
widely written about in the popu-lar press since the early 1970s. It is widely
believed that these articles and books, which strongly encourage knowledge of
her genital anatomy, masturbation and active pursuit of orgasm, have enabled
many women to grow more comfortable and competent in sexual expression.
When a man can readily attain a lasting erection with a partner, yet is
consistently unable to attain orgasm in the body of the partner, he is
diagnosed with male orgasmic disorder (MOD). The disorder has three levels of
severity: 1) the most common form is characterized by the ability to attain orgasm with a partner outside of her or his body,
either through oral, manual, or personal masturbation; 2) the more severe form
is character-ized by the man’s inability to ejaculate in his partner’s
pres-ence; and 3) the rarest form is characterized by the inability to
ejaculate when awake. The disorder is usually lifelong and not partner
specific. These men cannot allow themselves to be swept away in arousal by
another person. They are sexu-ally vigilant not to allow themselves to be
controlled by the partner’s power to convey them to orgasm. This power would
provide the partner with personal pleasure and the man with this disorder,
while initially appearing to be a sexual super-man, ultimately disappoints the
partner. Their psychological dysfunction represents a capacity to use a mental
mechanism which other men would love to possess in smaller degrees. Both the partners
and the therapists of these men tend to describe them as controlling,
unemotional, untrusting, hostile, obses-sive–compulsive, or paranoid. Some of
these men improve with psychotherapy, others improve spontaneously with time
and, for others, the dysfunction leads to the cessation of the as-piration for
sex with a partner. One controlled study of patients with numerous sexual
dysfunctions suggested that bupropion 300 to 450 mg/day may improve the
capacity to ejaculate in a minority of patients.
Premature ejaculation is a high prevalence (25–40% disorder seen
primarily in heterosexuals characterized by an untameably low threshold for the
reflex sequence of orgasm. The problem, a physiological efficiency of sperm delivery, causes social and psychological
distress. In failing to develop a sense of control over the timing of his
orgasm in the vagina, the man fails to meet his standards of being a satisfying
sexual partner. However, if his partner does not explicitly or implicitly
object, his rapidity is not likely to cause him to seek medical attention. The
range of intrav-aginal containment times among self-diagnosed patients extends
from immediately before or upon vaginal entry (rare), to less than a minute
(usual), to less than the man and his partner desire (not infrequent). Time
alone is a misleading indicator, however. The essence of the self-diagnosis is
an emotionally unsatisfying sex-ual equilibrium apparently due to the man’s
inability to temper his arousal. Most men sometimes ejaculate before they wish
to, but not persistently.
The history should clarify the answers to following questions: Why is he
seeking therapy now? Is the patient a sexual beginner or a beginner with a
particular partner? Does he have inordi-nately high expectations for
intravaginal containment time for a man his age and experience? Is he desperate
about losing the partner because of the rapid ejaculation? Is the relationship
in jeopardy for another reason? Does his partner have a sexual dys-function?
Does she have orgasms with him other than through intercourse? Is he requesting
help in order to cover his infidel-ity? Is his partner now blaming the man’s
sexual inadequacy for her infidelity? Is his new symptom a reflection of his
fear about having a serious physical problem during sex such as angina, a stroke,
or another myocardial infarction? The answers will en-able the doctor to
classify the rapid ejaculation into an acquired or lifelong and specific or
general pattern, to sense the larger context in which his sexual behavior is
conducted and to plan treatment.
Premature ejaculation reflects to the man’s sense that his contribution
to the sexual equilibrium is deficient. It implies that he considers that he is
far behind most men in his vaginal con-tainment time and that he wants to
provide his partner with a better opportunity to be nurtured during lovemaking
through prolonged intercourse. Typically, he aspires to “bring” his part-ner to
orgasm during intercourse. If anxiety lowers the ejacula-tory threshold and
keeps it from its natural evolution to a higher level over time, then premature
ejaculation is a self-perpetuating pattern. Premature ejaculation may last a
lifetime.
There are three efficient approaches to this dysfunction. The
first is simply to refuse to confirm the patient’s self- diagno-sis.
Some anxious beginners, men with reasonable intravagi-nal containment times of
two or more minutes, and those with exaggerated notions of sexual performance
can be calmed down by a few visits. When they no longer think of them-selves as
dysfunctional their intravaginal containment times improve. The second is the
use of serotonergic medications. In a study of 15 carefully selected stable
couples, daily adminis-tration of clomipramine 25 and 50 mg increased
intravaginal containment times on average of 249% and 517% over base-line
observations (Althof et al., 1995).
At these dosage levels, there were few side effects. Numerous similar reports
testify to the fact that various serotonergic reuptake inhibitors can
significantly lengthen the duration of intercourse. Clinicians need to
determine with each patient whether the medication can be taken within hours or
days of anticipated intercourse. Improvement is not sustained after medication
is stopped. Serotonergic medications are the most common treatment of rapid
ejaculation because they are so quickly effective in over 90% of men. The third
approach is behaviorally-oriented sex therapy that trains the man to focus his
attention on his penile sensations during vaginal containment and to signal his
part-ner to cease movement or to apply a firm squeeze of the glans/ shaft area
to interrupt the escalation of arousal. This requires an increase in
communication and full cooperation of the part-ner which in themselves can go a
long way in improving their sexual equilibrium.
Rapid ejaculation in some men reflects mere inexperience; for others it
is stubborn physiological efficiency; for others it re-flects fear of personal
harm, which is either related to physical illness or to unresolved fears of
closeness to a woman; and yet for others it reflects a partnership with a
profoundly inhibited blam-ing partner. If the psychodynamic question is asked
of men with persistent rapid ejaculation, “Why does this man want to finish
intercourse so quickly?” the answers vary from, “It is not a rel-evant
question!” to “I’m afraid of her!” to “I’m afraid of what will happen to me”.
For instance, a large percentage of men ejaculate quickly for the first months
after a myocardial infarction.
The advantages of costlier couple psychotherapy are to allow the man and
his partner to understand their lives better, to address both of their sexual
anxieties, and to deal with other important nonsexual issues in their
relationship. Effective psy-chotherapy allows the man to become positioned to
continue the usual biological evolution that occurs during the life-cycle from
rapid ejaculation, which is true for many young men, to occa-sional difficulty
in ejaculating, which is true for many men in their sixties.
The clinician needs to consider a series of questions when deal-ing with
a woman who reports painful intercourse. Does she have a known gynecologic
abnormality which is generally as-sociated with pain? Is there anything about
her complaint of pain that indicates a remarkably low pain threshold? Does she
now have an aversion to sexual intercourse? At what level of physical
discomfort did she develop the aversion? Does her private view of her current
relationship affect her willingness to be sexual and her experience of pain?
Does her partner’s sexual style cause her physical or mental discomfort, for
example, is he overly aggres-sive or does he stimulate memories of former
abuse? What has been the partner’s response to her pain? What role does her
an-ticipation of pain play in her experience of pain?
These clinical questions are typical biopsychosocial ones. Sex-limiting
pain often is the result of the subtle interplay of personal and relational,
cognitive and affective, and fundamen-tal biological processes that are inherent
in other human sexual struggles that operate to produce these confusing
disorders.
The DSM-IV presents dyspareunia and vaginismus as dis-tinct entities.
However, they have been viewed as inextricably connected in much of the modern
sexuality literature: vaginis-mus is known to create dyspareunia and
dyspareunia has been known to create vaginismus.
Related Topics
Privacy Policy, Terms and Conditions, DMCA Policy and Compliant
Copyright © 2018-2023 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.