Gender Identity Disorders
The organization of a stable gender identity is the first component of sexual identity to emerge during childhood. The processes that enable this accomplishment are so subtle that when a daughter consistently acts as though she realizes that “I am a girl and that is all right”, or when a son’s behavior announces that “I am a boy and that is all right”, families rarely even remember their chil-dren’s confusion and behaviors to the contrary. Adolescent and adult gender problems are not rare. They are however commonly hidden from social view, sometimes long enough to developmen-tally evolve into other less dramatic forms of sexual identity
Although occasionally the parents of a feminine son have a con-vincing anecdote about persistent feminine interests dating from early in the second year of life, boyhood femininity is more typi-cally only apparent by the third year. By the fourth year playmate preferences become obvious. Same-sex playmate preference is a typical characteristic of young children. Cross-gender–identified children consistently demonstrate the opposite sex playmate pref-erence. The avoidance of other boys has serious consequences in terms of social rejection and loneliness throughout the school years. The peer problems of feminine boys cause some of their behavioral and emotional problems which are in evidence by mid-dle-to-late childhood. However, psychometric studies support clinical impressions that feminine boys have emotional problems even before peer relationships become a factor, that is, something more basic about being cross-gender-identified creates problems. Young feminine boys have been shown to be depressed and have difficulties with separation anxiety.
Speculations about the origin of boyhood femininity generally suggest converging cumulative forces. Any child’s cross-gender identifications are likely to involve a host of fac-tors: constitutional forces, problematic interactions with parents, problematic internal processing of life experiences and family misfortune: financial, reproductive, physical disease, emotional illness, or death of vital persons. These factors are sometimes restated as temperament, disturbed family functioning, separa-tion–individuation problems and trauma.
Temperament is a dual phenomenon being both the child’s predisposition to respond to the world in a certain way and the as-pects of the child to which others respond. The common tempera-mental factors of feminine boys have been described as: a sense of body fragility and vulnerability that leads to the avoidance of rough-and-tumble play; timidity and fearfulness in the face of new situations; a vulnerability to separation and loss; an unusual capacity for positive emotional connection to others; an ability to imitate; sensitivities to sound, color, texture, odor, temperature and pain (Coates et al., 1992).
The development of boyhood femininity may occur within the mind of the toddler in response to a loss of emotional avail-ability of the nurturant mother. The child creates a maternal (feminine) self through imitation and fantasy in order to make up for the mother’s emotional unavailability. This occurs beyond the family’s awareness and is left in place by the family either ignoring what has transpired in the son or valuing it. The problem for the effeminate boy is that reality – the social expectations of other people – is unyielding on gender issues; the adaptive early life solution becomes progressively more maladaptive with time.
The answer to the question whether boyhood femininity is entirely constitutional, an adaptive solution, or due to a combina-tion that includes some other process is not known. A few reports of femininity giving way to psychotherapeutic interventions with young boys and their families are of heuristic value but limited in follow-up duration.
Green prospectively studied a large well-matched group of feminine boys for over a decade and discovered that boyhood ef-feminacy was a frequent precursor of adolescent homoeroticism and homosexual behavior rather than gender identity disorders. He observed, as had others before, that without therapy feminine gender role behaviors give rise to more masculine behavioral styles as adolescence emerges (Green, 1987).
The masculinity of girls may become apparent as early as age 2 years. The number of girls brought to clinical attention for cross-gendered behaviors, self-statements and aspirations is con-sistently less than boys by a factor of 1: 5 at any age of childhood in Western countries (except Poland). It is not known whether this reflects a genuine difference in incidence of childhood gen-der disorders, cultural perceptions of femininity as a negative in boys versus the neutral-to-positive perception of boy-like behav-iors in girls, the broader range of cross-gender expression per-mitted to girls but not to boys, or an intuitive understanding that cross-gender identity more accurately predicts homosexuality in boys than girls.
The distinction between tomboys and gender-disordered girls is often difficult to make. Tomboys are thought of as not as deeply unhappy about their femaleness, not as impossible occa-sionally to dress in stereotypic female clothing, and not thought to have a profound aversion to their girlish and future womanly physiologic transformations. Tomboys are able to enjoy some fem-inine activities along with their obvious pleasures in masculine-identified toys and games and the company of boys. Girls who are diagnosed as gender-disordered generally seem to have a relentless intensity about their masculine preoccupations and an insistence about their future. The onset of their cross-gendered identifications is early in life. Although most lesbians have a history of tomboyish behaviors, most tomboys develop a heterosexual orientation.
Children, teenagers and adults exist who rue the day they were born to their biological sex and who long for the opportunity sim-ply to live their lives in a manner befitting the other gender. They repudiate the possibility of finding happiness within the broad framework of roles given to members of their sex by their society. Their repudiation is not motivated by an intellectual attack on sexism, homophobia, or any other injustice imbedded in cultural mores. A gender-disordered person literally repudiates his or her body, repudiates the self in that body and rejects performing roles expected of people with that body. It is a subtle, usually self-contained rebellion against the need of others to designate them in terms of their biological sex.
The repudiation and rebellion may first occur as a subjec-tive internal drama of fantasy, as behavioral expression in play, or a preference for the company of others. Regardless of when and how it is displayed, the drama of the gender-disordered involves the relentless feeling that “life would be better – easier, fuller, more enjoyable – if I and others could experience me as a mem-ber of the opposite sex”.
By mid-adolescence, the extremely gender-disordered have often envisioned the solution for their paralyzing self-consciousness: to live as a member of the opposite gender, to transform their bodies to the extent possible by modern medicine, and to be accepted by all others as the opposite sex. Most people with these cross-gender preoccupations, however, do not go be-yond the fantasy or private cross-dressing. Those that do eventu-ally come to psychiatric attention. When a clinician is called in, the family has one set of hopes, the patient another. The clinician has many tasks, one of which is to mediate between the ambitions of the gender-disordered person and society and see what can be done to help the patient. Negative countertransference may steer the clinician to deal with the opportunity expeditiously: “Obvi-ously the patient is sick, maybe psychotic, and needs help. I don’t take care of people who do these things. Refer it out!” With a lit-tle supervisory encouragement to perform a thorough evaluation, therapists soon find that these patients possess many of the ordi-nary aspects of life and one unusual ambition: they often want to be the opposite sex so badly that they are willing to make it a priority over family, friends, vocation and material acquisition.
Adults who permanently change their bodies to deal with their gender dilemmas represent the far end of the spectrum of adapta-tions to gender problems. Even the lives of those who reject bod-ily change, however, have considerable pain because the images of a better gendered self may recur throughout life, becoming more powerful whenever life becomes strained or disappointing.
The diagnosis of the extreme end of the gender identity dis-order spectrum is clinically obvious. The challenging diagnostic task for clinicians is to suspect a gender problem and inquire about gender identity and its evolution in those whose manner suggest unisexed or cross-gendered appearance, those with dissociative gender identity disorder (GID), severe forms of character pathol-ogy and those who seem unusual in some undefinable manner.
DSM-IV provides the clinician with two Axis I gender diagnoses. To qualify for the first, a patient of any age must meet four criteria:
Criterion 1: Strong, persistent cross-gender identifica-tion Because young children may not verbalize enough about their inner experiences for the clinician to be certain that this criterion is met, at least four of five manifestations of cross-gen-der identification must be present: 1) repeatedly stated desire to be, or insistence that he or she is, the opposite sex; 2) in boys, preference for cross-dressing or simulating female attire; in girls, insistence on wearing stereotypical masculine clothing; 3) strong and persistent preferences for cross-gender roles in fantasy play or persistent fantasies of being the opposite sex; 4) intense de-sire to participate in the games and pastimes of the opposite sex; 5) strong preference for playmates of the opposite sex.
In adolescence and adulthood, this criterion is fulfilled when the patient states the desire to be the opposite sex, has fre-quent social forays into appearing as the opposite sex, desires to live or be treated as the opposite sex, or has the conviction that his or her feelings and reactions are those typical of the opposite sex.
Criterion 2: Persistent discomfort with one’s gender or the sense of inappropriateness in a gender role This criterion is fulfilled in boys who assert that their penis or testicles are dis-gusting or will disappear or that it would be better not to have these organs; or who demonstrate an aversion toward rough-and-tumble play and rejection of male stereotypical toys, games and activities. In girls, rejection of urinating in a sitting position or assertion that they do not want to grow breasts or menstruate, or marked aversion towards normative feminine clothing fulfill this criterion.
Among adolescents and adults, this criterion is fulfilled by the patients’ exhibiting the following characteristics: preoc-cupation with getting rid of primary and secondary sex charac-teristics; preoccupation with thoughts about hormones, surgery, or other alterations of the body to enhance the capacity to pass as a member of the opposite sex such as electrolysis for beard removal, cricoid cartilage shave to minimize the Adam’s apple, breast augmentation, or preoccupation with the belief that one was born into the wrong sex.
Criterion 3: Not due to an intersex condition In the vast ma-jority of clinical circumstances the patient possesses normal gen-ital anatomy and sexual physiology. When a patient with a gender identity disorder and an accompanying intersex condition such as congenital adrenal hyperplasia, an anomaly of the genitalia, or a chromosomal abnormality is encountered, the clinician will be uncertain whether the intersex condition is the cause of the GID. The clinician may either diagnose gender identity disorder not otherwise specified (GIDNOS) or classify the patient as hav-ing a GID and list the physical factor on Axis III as a comorbid condition. The relationship between GID and intersex conditions is controversial topic that may be clarified with further research being done in Germany.
Criterion 4: Significant distress and impairment It is likely that many children, adolescents and adults struggle for a while to consolidate their gender identity but eventually find an adap-tation that does not impair their capacities to function socially, academically, or vocationally as a member of their sex. These persons do not qualify for GID nor do those who simply are not stereotypic in how they portray their gender roles. Mental health professionals occasionally encounter parents who are disturbed by their adolescent child’s gender roles. Parental distress is not the point of criterion 4; this criterion refers to patient distress.
If an accurate community-based study of the gender-impaired could be conducted, most cases would be diagnosed as GIDNOS. The diagnostician needs to understand that gender identity de-velopment is a dynamic evolutionary process and clinicians see people at crisis points in their lives. At any given time, although it is clear that the patient has some form of GID, it may not be that which is described in DSM-IV as GID. Here is one example: an adult female calls herself a “neuter”. She wants her breasts re-moved because she hates to be perceived as a woman. For 2 years she has been exploring “neuterdom” and “I am definitely not in-terested in being a man!” If in 2 years, she evolves to meet crite-rion 1, her current GIDNOS diagnosis will change.
GIDNOS is a large category designed to be inclusive of those with unusual genders who do not clearly fit the criteria of GID. There is no implication that if a patient is labeled GIDNOS that his or her label cannot change in the future. GIDNOS would contain the many forms of transvestism: masculine-appearing boys and teenagers with persistent cross-dressing (former fet-ishistic transvestites) who are evolving toward GID, socially iso-lated men who want to become a woman shortly after their wives or mothers die (secondary transvestites) but express considerable ambivalence about the very matter they passionately desired at their last visit, extremely feminized homosexuals including those with careers as “drag queens” who seem to want to change their sex when depressed, and so on. GIDNOS would also capture men who want to be rid of their genitals without being feminized, uni-sexual females who imagine themselves as males but who are terrified of any social expression of their masculine gender iden-tity, hypermasculine lesbians in periodic turmoil over their gen-der, and those women who strongly identify with both male and female who lately want mastectomies. In using gender identity diagnoses, clinicians need to remember that extremely masculine women or extremely feminine men are not to be dismissed as ho-mosexual. “Lesbian” or “gay” is only a description of orientation. They are more aptly described as also cross-gendered.
The usual clarity of distinctions between heterosexual, bisexual and homosexual orientations rests upon the assumption that the biological sex and psychological gender of the person and the partner are known. A woman who designates herself as a les-bian is understood to mean she is erotically attracted to other women. “Lesbian” loses its meaning if the woman says she feels she is a man and lives as one. She insists, “I am a heterosexual man; men are attracted to women as am I!” The baffled clini-cian may erroneously think, “You are a female therefore you are a lesbian!” DSM-IV suggests that adults with GIDs should be subgrouped according to which sex the patient is currently sexu-ally attracted: males, females, both, or neither. This makes sense for most gender patients because it is their gender identity that is most important to them. Some are rigid about the sex of those to whom they are attracted because it supports their idea about their gender, others are bierotic and are not too concerned with their orientation, still others have not had enough experiences to overcome their uncertainty about their orientation. A few gender patients find all partners too complicated and are only interested in themselves.
The treatment of these conditions, although not as well-based on scientific evidence as some psychiatric disorders, has been carefully scrutinized by multidisciplinary committees of special-ists within the Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association for over 20 years. For more details in managing an individual patient, please consult its “Standards of Care” (Meyer et al., 2001). The treatment of any GID begins after a careful evaluation, including parents, other family members, spouses, psychometric testing, and occasionally physical and laboratory examination. The details will depend on age of the patient. It is possible, of course, to have a GID as well as mental retardation, a psychosis, dysthymia, severe character pathology, or any other psychiatric diagnosis (Table 57.8).
No one knows how to cure an adult’s gender problem. People who have lived long with profound cross-gender identifications do not get insight – either behaviorally modified or medicated – and find that they subsequently have a conventional gender identity. Psy-chotherapy is useful, nonetheless. If the patient is able to trust a therapist, there can be much to talk about: family relationships are often painful, barriers to relationship intimacy are profound, work poses many difficult issues, and the patient has to make monumental decisions. The central one is, “How am I going to live my life? Should I go through with cross-gender living, hor-mone therapy, mastectomy, or genital surgery?” The therapist can help the patient recognize the drawbacks and advantages of the various available options and to respect the initially unrecog-nized or unstated ambivalence. Completion of the gender trans-formation process usually takes longer than the patient desires, and the therapist can be an important source of support during and after these changes.
Group therapy for gender-disordered people has the advantages of allowing patients to know others with gender problems, of de-creasing their social isolation, and of being among people who do not experience their cross-gender aspirations and their past be-haviors as weird. Group members can provide help with groom-ing and more convincing public appearances. The success of these groups depends on the therapist’s skills in patient selection and using the group process. Groups are generally only available in a few specialized treatment programs.
Living in the aspired-to-gender role – working, relating, conduct-ing the activities of daily living – is a vital process that enables one of three decisions: to abandon the quest, to simply live in this new role, or to proceed with breast or genital surgery (Peterson and Dickey, 1995). Some clinicians use the real-life test as a cri-terion for recommending hormones but this varies because some patients’ abilities to present themselves in a new way is definitely enhanced by prior administration of cross-sex hormones. The reason for the real-life test is to give the patient, who created a transsexual solution in fantasy, an opportunity to experience the solution in social reality. Passing the real-life test is expected to be associated with improved psychological function.
Ideally, hormones should be administered by endocrinologists who have a working relationship with a mental health team dealing with gender problems. The effects of administration of estrogen to a biological male are: breast development, testicular atrophy, decreased sexual drive, decreased semen volume and fertility, softening of skin, fat redistribution in a female pattern and decrease in spontaneous erections. Breast development is often the highest concern to the patient. Because hair growth is not affected by estrogens, electrolysis is often used to remove beard growth. Side effects within recommended doses are minimal but hypertension, hyperglycemia, lipid abnormalities, thrombophlebitis and hepatic dysfunction have been described. The most dramatic effect of hormones is on the sense of well-being. Patients report feeling calmer, happier knowing that their bodies are being demasculinized and feminized. All results derive from open-labeled studies.
The administration of androgen to females results in an increased sexual drive, clitoral tingling and growth, weight gain, and amenorrhea and hoarseness. An increase in muscle mass may be apparent if weight training is undertaken simultaneously. Hairgrowth depends on the patient’s genetic potential. Androgens are administrated intramuscularly 200 to 300 mg/month and are generally safe. It is prudent, however, periodically to monitor he-patic, lipid and thyroid functioning. Most patients are delighted with their bodily changes, although some are disappointed that they remain short, wide-hipped, relatively hairless men with breasts that do not significantly regress.
Surgical intervention is the final external step. It should not occur without mental health professional’s input, even when the patient provides a heart-felt convincing set of reasons to bypass the real-life test, hormones and therapeutic relationship. Genital surgery is expensive, time-consuming, at times painful, and has frequent anatomic complications and functional disappointments. Sur-gery can be expected to add further improvements in the lives of patients: more social activities with friends and family, more activity in sports, more partner sexual activity and improved vo-cational status.
Males Surgery consists of penectomy, orchiectomy, vagino-plasty and fashioning of a labia. The procedures used for the creation of a neovagina have evolved over the years. Postopera-tively, the patient must maintain the patency of the neovagina by initially constantly wearing and then periodically using a vaginal dilator. Vaginal stenosis or shortening is a frequent complication. The quest for an unmistakable feminine shape leads many young adult patients to augmentation mammoplasty and the shaving of their cricoid cartilage.
Females The creation of a male-appearing chest through mas-tectomies and contouring of the chest wall requires only a brief hospital stay. Patients are usually immediately delighted with their new-found freedom, but their fantasies of going shirtless are often not fulfilled due to the presence of two noticeable hori-zontal chest scars. The creation of a neophallus that can become erect, contain a functional urethra throughout its length (enabling urination while standing), and pass as an unremarkable penis in a locker room has been a significant surgical challenge. It is far from perfected. The surgery is, however, the most time-consum-ing, technically difficult and expensive of all the sex reassign-ment procedures. Erection is made possible by a penile prosthe-sis. Many prudent patients consider themselves reassigned when they have a hysterectomy, oophorectomy and mastectomy. Some just have a mastectomy. They find a partner who understands the situation and supports the idea of living with, and loving with, female genitals.