Home | | Genetics and Molecular Biology | Need for and the Realization of Hair-Trigger Induction

Chapter: Genetics and Molecular Biology: Lambda Phage Genes and Regulatory Circuitry

| Study Material, Lecturing Notes, Assignment, Reference, Wiki description explanation, brief detail |

Need for and the Realization of Hair-Trigger Induction

Why does lambda possess regulation systems as complicated as those described above? Part of the answer is that lambda must switch between two states, lytic and lysogenic.

The Need for and the Realization of Hair-Trigger Induction

Why does lambda possess regulation systems as complicated as those described above? Part of the answer is that lambda must switch between two states, lytic and lysogenic. Even so, this does not explain why a simple repressor like that found in the lac operon could not suffice for lambda’s needs. In part the answer lies in the fact that lambda must regulate its gene activities over a much greater range than lac. The basal level of the lac operon is 0.1% of the fully induced level, and there is no apparent reason why a lower basal level would serve any useful purpose. A similar basal level of repression of lambda early genes would be disastrous, for lambda would then have a high rate of spontaneous induction from the lysogenic state. Experimentally the spontaneous induction rate is low. Typically in a doubling time, fewer than one cell out of 106 spontaneously cures of lambda or induces. This low rate means that the basal level of expression of the lambda early genes is very low indeed.

Suppose the basal level of expression of a repressible operon similar to the lac operon is to be generated by increasing the concentration of repressor. To reduce the basal level to 1/1000 of normal, the repressor level would have to be raised 1000-fold. Not only would this be wasteful of repressor, but even worse are the implications for induction. With 10,000 molecules of repressor per cell, inducing the early genes to greater than 50% of maximal would require inactivating approximately of 9,998 repressor molecules per cell. Although lambda phage may like to hitch a free ride in healthy cells, once viability of the cells is in question because of damage to the host DNA, lambda bails out and induces. The lambda in very few cells indeed would be capable of inducing if 99.995% of the repressor within a cell had to be inactivated before early genes could be turned on efficiently.


Table 14.5 Derepression of the Lambda PromoterpRand the lac Promoter as a Function of the Amountof Repressor Remaining Active



One of lambda’s solutions to the problem of being either repressed or induced has been to evolve a nonlinear induction response. At the normal levels of repressor, of about 100 dimers per cell, lambda is fully repressed. However, if 90% of repressor has been inactivated, the pR promoter of lambda is 50% of fully induced. For comparison, inactiva-tion of 90% of lac repressor induces the lac operon only 3% (Table 14.5). The highly cooperative binding of repressor to OR1 and OR2 is largely responsible for lambda’s nonlinear response. This can be understood quantitatively as follows. Since the high cooperativity in repressor binding means that most often OR1 and OR2 are either unoccupied or simultaneously occupied, it is a good approximation to assume that two repressors bind to operator at the same time. Combining the binding equation that defines the dissociation constant with the conservation equation and solving yields the ratio of free operator O to total operator OT, that is, the relative amount of derepression as a function of repressor concentration:


As the concentration of free repressor falls from a value a bit above KD1/2 to a value below KD1/2, promoter activity, which is proportional to the fraction of operator unoccupied by repressor, O/OT, increases rapidly due to the R2 term. Hence very sharp changes in operator occupancy can be produced with relatively small changes in the concentration of repressor (Fig. 14.14).


Figure 14.14 Exaggerated exam-ple of the nonlinearity in the repression of pR as a function of repressor concentration. The op-erator is fully occupied and off at concentration R1; at a repressor concentration about half of R1, the operator is unoccupied and the promoter is largely derepressed.


Lambda repressor uses another mechanism in addition to coopera-tive binding to the operators to increase the nonlinearity in its response to repressor concentration. Only dimers of the repressor polypeptide are able to bind to lambda operators under physiological conditions. The dissociation constant governing the repressor monomer-dimer reaction is such that a small reduction from the normal intracellular concentration of repressor sharply reduces the concentration of active repressor dimers. The combination of repressor monomer association-dissociation, cooperativity in repressor binding, and the need for sus-tained synthesis of N protein for lambda induction and development produces a very nonlinear induction response to changes in repressor level. At one concentration of repressor, lambda is highly stable as a lysogen, but at a lower concentration, lambda almost fully derepresses pLand pR.


Study Material, Lecturing Notes, Assignment, Reference, Wiki description explanation, brief detail


Copyright © 2018-2020 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.