![if !IE]> <![endif]>
Relationship Types, Relationship Sets, Roles, and Structural Constraints
In Figure 7.8 there are several implicit relationships among the various entity types. In fact, whenever an attribute of one entity type refers to another entity type, some relationship exists. For example, the attribute Manager of DEPARTMENT refers to an employee who manages the department; the attribute Controlling_department of PROJECT refers to the department that controls the project; the attribute Supervisor of EMPLOYEE refers to another employee (the one who supervises this employee); the attribute Department of EMPLOYEE refers to the department for which the employee works; and so on. In the ER model, these references should not be represented as attributes but as relationships, which are discussed in this section. The COMPANY database schema will be refined in Section 7.6 to represent relationships explicitly. In the initial design of entity types, relationships are typically captured in the form of attributes. As the design is refined, these attributes get converted into relationships between entity types.
This section is organized as follows: Section 7.4.1 introduces the concepts of rela-tionship types, relationship sets, and relationship instances. We define the concepts of relationship degree, role names, and recursive relationships in Section 7.4.2, and then we discuss structural constraints on relationships—such as cardinality ratios and existence dependencies—in Section 7.4.3. Section 7.4.4 shows how relationship types can also have attributes.
1. Relationship Types, Sets, and Instances
A relationship type R among n entity types E1, E2, ..., En defines a set of associa-tions—or a relationship set—among entities from these entity types. As for the case of entity types and entity sets, a relationship type and its corresponding rela-tionship set are customarily referred to by the same name, R. Mathematically, the relationship set R is a set of relationship instances ri, where each ri associates n individual entities (e1, e2, ..., en), and each entity ej in ri is a member of entity set Ej, 1 f j f n. Hence, a relationship set is a mathematical relation on E1, E2, ..., En; alter-natively, it can be defined as a subset of the Cartesian product of the entity sets E1 × E2 × ... × En. Each of the entity types E1, E 2, ..., En is said to participate in the rela-tionship type R; similarly, each of the individual entities e1, e2, ..., en is said to participate in the relationship instance ri = (e1, e2, ..., en).
Informally, each relationship instance ri in R is an association of entities, where the association includes exactly one entity from each participating entity type. Each such relationship instance ri represents the fact that the entities participating in ri are related in some way in the corresponding miniworld situation. For example, consider a relationship type WORKS_FOR between the two entity types EMPLOYEE and DEPARTMENT, which associates each employee with the department for which the employee works in the corresponding entity set. Each relationship instance in the relationship set WORKS_FOR associates one EMPLOYEE entity and one DEPARTMENT entity. Figure 7.9 illustrates this example, where each relationship
instance ri is shown connected to the EMPLOYEE and DEPARTMENT entities that participate in ri. In the miniworld represented by Figure 7.9, employees e1, e3, and e6 work for department d1; employees e2 and e4 work for department d2; and employ-ees e5 and e7 work for department d3.
In ER diagrams, relationship types are displayed as diamond-shaped boxes, which are connected by straight lines to the rectangular boxes representing the participat-ing entity types. The relationship name is displayed in the diamond-shaped box (see Figure 7.2).
2. Relationship Degree, Role Names, and Recursive Relationships
Degree of a Relationship Type. The degree of a relationship type is the number of participating entity types. Hence, the WORKS_FOR relationship is of degree two. A relationship type of degree two is called binary, and one of degree three is called ternary. An example of a ternary relationship is SUPPLY, shown in Figure 7.10, where each relationship instance ri associates three entities—a supplier s, a part p, and a project j—whenever s supplies part p to project j. Relationships can generally be of any degree, but the ones most common are binary relationships. Higher-degree relationships are generally more complex than binary relationships; we characterize them further in Section 7.9.
Relationships as Attributes. It is sometimes convenient to think of a binary relationship type in terms of attributes, as we discussed in Section 7.3.3. Consider the WORKS_FOR relationship type in Figure 7.9. One can think of an attribute called Department of the EMPLOYEE entity type, where the value of Department for each EMPLOYEE entity is (a reference to) the DEPARTMENT entity for which that employee works. Hence, the value set for this Department attribute is the set of all DEPARTMENT entities, which is the DEPARTMENT entity set. This is what we did in Figure 7.8 when we specified the initial design of the entity type EMPLOYEE for the COMPANY database. However, when we think of a binary relationship as an attribute, we always have two options. In this example, the alternative is to think of a multivalued attribute Employee of the entity type DEPARTMENT whose values for each DEPARTMENT entity is the set of EMPLOYEE entities who work for that department. The value set of this Employee attribute is the power set of the EMPLOYEE entity set. Either of these two attributes—Department of EMPLOYEE or Employee of DEPARTMENT—can represent the WORKS_FOR relationship type. If both are represented, they are constrained to be inverses of each other.
Role Names and Recursive Relationships. Each entity type that participates in a relationship type plays a particular role in the relationship. The role name signifies the role that a participating entity from the entity type plays in each relation-ship instance, and helps to explain what the relationship means. For example, in the WORKS_FOR relationship type, EMPLOYEE plays the role of employee or worker and DEPARTMENT plays the role of department or employer.
Role names are not technically necessary in relationship types where all the partici-pating entity types are distinct, since each participating entity type name can be used as the role name. However, in some cases the same entity type participates more than once in a relationship type in different roles. In such cases the role name becomes essential for distinguishing the meaning of the role that each participating entity plays. Such relationship types are called recursive relationships. Figure 7.11 shows an example. The SUPERVISION relationship type relates an employee to a supervisor, where both employee and supervisor entities are members of the same EMPLOYEE entity set. Hence, the EMPLOYEE entity type participates twice in SUPERVISION: once in the role of supervisor (or boss), and once in the role of supervisee (or subordinate). Each relationship instance ri in SUPERVISION associates two employee entities ej and ek, one of which plays the role of supervisor and the other the role of supervisee. In Figure 7.11, the lines marked ‘1’ represent the super-visor role, and those marked ‘2’ represent the supervisee role; hence, e1 supervises e2 and e3, e4 supervises e6 and e7, and e5 supervises e1 and e4. In this example, each relationship instance must be connected with two lines, one marked with ‘1’ (supervisor) and the other with ‘2’ (supervisee).
3. Constraints on Binary Relationship Types
Relationship types usually have certain constraints that limit the possible combinations of entities that may participate in the corresponding relationship set. These constraints are determined from the miniworld situation that the relationships rep-resent. For example, in Figure 7.9, if the company has a rule that each employee must work for exactly one department, then we would like to describe this constraint in the schema. We can distinguish two main types of binary relationship constraints: cardinality ratio and participation.
Cardinality Ratios for Binary Relationships. The cardinality ratio for a binary relationship specifies the maximum number of relationship instances that an entity can participate in. For example, in the WORKS_FOR binary relationship type, DEPARTMENT:EMPLOYEE is of cardinality ratio 1:N, meaning that each department can be related to (that is, employs) any number of employees,9 but an employee can be related to (work for) only one department. This means that for this particular relationship WORKS_FOR, a particular department entity can be related to any number of employees (N indicates there is no maximum number). On the other hand, an employee can be related to a maximum of one department. The possible cardinality ratios for binary relationship types are 1:1, 1:N, N:1, and M:N.
An example of a 1:1 binary relationship is MANAGES (Figure 7.12), which relates a department entity to the employee who manages that department. This represents the miniworld constraints that—at any point in time—an employee can manage one department only and a department can have one manager only. The relation-ship type WORKS_ON (Figure 7.13) is of cardinality ratio M:N, because the mini
world rule is that an employee can work on several projects and a project can have several employees.
Cardinality ratios for binary relationships are represented on ER diagrams by dis-playing 1, M, and N on the diamonds as shown in Figure 7.2. Notice that in this notation, we can either specify no maximum (N) or a maximum of one (1) on participation. An alternative notation (see Section 7.7.4) allows the designer to specify a specific maximum number on participation, such as 4 or 5.
Participation Constraints and Existence Dependencies. The participation constraint specifies whether the existence of an entity depends on its being related to another entity via the relationship type. This constraint specifies the minimum number of relationship instances that each entity can participate in, and is some-times called the minimum cardinality constraint. There are two types of participa-tion constraints—total and partial—that we illustrate by example. If a company policy states that every employee must work for a department, then an employee entity can exist only if it participates in at least one WORKS_FOR relationship instance (Figure 7.9). Thus, the participation of EMPLOYEE in WORKS_FOR is called total participation, meaning that every entity in the total set of employee entities must be related to a department entity via WORKS_FOR. Total participation is also called existence dependency. In Figure 7.12 we do not expect every employee to manage a department, so the participation of EMPLOYEE in the MANAGES relationship type is partial, meaning that some or part of the set of employee entities are related to some department entity via MANAGES, but not necessarily all. We will refer to the cardinality ratio and participation constraints, taken together, as the structural constraints of a relationship type.
In ER diagrams, total participation (or existence dependency) is displayed as a double line connecting the participating entity type to the relationship, whereas partial participation is represented by a single line (see Figure 7.2). Notice that in this notation, we can either specify no minimum (partial participation) or a minimum of one (total participation). The alternative notation (see Section 7.7.4) allows the designer to specify a specific minimum number on participation in the relationship, such as 4 or 5.
We will discuss constraints on higher-degree relationships in Section 7.9.
4. Attributes of Relationship Types
Relationship types can also have attributes, similar to those of entity types. For example, to record the number of hours per week that an employee works on a particular project, we can include an attribute Hours for the WORKS_ON relationship type in Figure 7.13. Another example is to include the date on which a manager started managing a department via an attribute Start_date for the MANAGES relationship type in Figure 7.12.
Notice that attributes of 1:1 or 1:N relationship types can be migrated to one of the participating entity types. For example, the Start_date attribute for the MANAGES relationship can be an attribute of either EMPLOYEE or DEPARTMENT, although conceptually it belongs to MANAGES. This is because MANAGES is a 1:1 relation-ship, so every department or employee entity participates in at most one relationship instance. Hence, the value of the Start_date attribute can be determined separately, either by the participating department entity or by the participating employee (manager) entity.
For a 1:N relationship type, a relationship attribute can be migrated only to the entity type on the N-side of the relationship. For example, in Figure 7.9, if the WORKS_FOR relationship also has an attribute Start_date that indicates when an employee started working for a department, this attribute can be included as an attribute of EMPLOYEE. This is because each employee works for only one department, and hence participates in at most one relationship instance in WORKS_FOR. In both 1:1 and 1:N relationship types, the decision where to place a relationship attribute—as a relationship type attribute or as an attribute of a participating entity type—is determined subjectively by the schema designer.
For M:N relationship types, some attributes may be determined by the combination of participating entities in a relationship instance, not by any single entity. Such attributes must be specified as relationship attributes. An example is the Hours attribute of the M:N relationship WORKS_ON (Figure 7.13); the number of hours per week an employee currently works on a project is determined by an employee-project combination and not separately by either entity.
Copyright © 2018-2023 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.