Family therapy
This term covers a wide range of
treatments with a similar diversity of theoretical underpinnings. They share
the idea that problems are affected by the communication between family members
and such communication can serve to maintain or to ameliorate their
difficulties.
One of the points of difference
concerns understanding of the prob-lem. Family therapy based on systems theory
might identify recurring dys-functional patterns of interaction and typically
might hypothesize that the presenting problem in one family member is a
manifestation of this. Such a view, of pathology being located between, rather
than within people, may be at odds with the Western focus on the individual. An
example of such an approach is the school-refusing child who is being kept home
to act as a buffer between parents who are in conflict. The child’s presence
may prevent dangerous escalation, but may also interfere with the parents’
ability to resolve their differences. Therapy in this case might focus on
helping the parents to address their difficulties without involvement of the
child, and for the child to trust his/her parents to do this and to get on with
being a child, e.g. going to school.
An alternative is to help the
family members to be aware that they are feeling overwhelmed by the problem,
have lost confidence, and are not seeing that they do have the resources to deal
with it. They might be helped to think of occasions when they have overcome
difficulties without the help of their child; or to see how they do this and
more often. The child may be helped to see that he/she does, at times, overcome
his/her fear and gets on with being a child, and can do more of this.
Finally, we can consider family
therapy for multifactorial illnesses, such as autism. This is not a product of
any particular family pattern or dysfunc-tion. However, this does not mean that
the family cannot be helped to manage this better. Such an approach is likely
to focus on support, on psycho-education, and on helping the family to address
the developmental (independence) issues, which are there for any family, but so
much more difficult when there is a child with chronic illness or disability.
The heterogeneity of family
therapy, the wide variety of problems it is used to address, and sometimes an
overemphasis on complex theory that can seem a long way from clinical practice
have contributed to a dearth of outcome research. There is evidence though for
effectiveness in a range of conditions including anorexia nervosa (AN).
Non-clinicians often see family
therapy as a potential panacea for all fam-ily based problems. Unfortunately
this is not the case and family therapy is not always the correct way to
address such difficulties. Family therapy is not possible if the family cannot,
or will not, attend. It is contraindicat-ed in families where one member is
being severely scapegoated. Unless there is reason to believe that such a
family is open to the idea of doing things differently once this pattern is
identified, family therapy should be discontinued.
Related Topics
Privacy Policy, Terms and Conditions, DMCA Policy and Compliant
Copyright © 2018-2026 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.