Home | | Sociology of Health | Evolution of Social medicine in India

Chapter: Sociology of Health : Sociology of Health

Evolution of Social medicine in India

1. What is Social Medicine? Meaning and scope 2. Genesis and evolution of social medicine 3. Development of preventive and social medicine 4. Challenges

Evolution of Social medicine in India.

 

1. What is Social Medicine? Meaning and scope:

 

This history dates back (at least) to the early nineteenth century when the systematic study of the relationships between society, disease, and medicine began in earnest. This study—and the forms of medical practice derived from it—became known as “social medicine.” Over time the term “social medicine” took on varied meanings as it was adapted to differing societies and diverse social conditions. Nonetheless, certain common principles underlie the term:

·              Social and economic conditions profoundly impact health, disease, and the practice of medicine.

 

·              The health of the population is a matter of social concern.

 

·              Society should promote health through both individual and social means.

 

Social conditions contribute to ill health. This was described as early as the 19th century by Rudolf Virchow, generally considered the founder of social medicine.

Social medicine, an approach to the prevention and treatment of disease that is based on the study of human heredity, environment, social structures, and cultural values.

 

It is the field of medicine that studies the impact of the collective behavior of organized society on individuals belonging to various, often disadvantaged, subgroups within the society. This is found in Engel’s phenomenon of Homelessness, Latchkey children, Supermom. Socialized medicine.

 

It is a specialized field of medical knowledge concentrating on the social, cultural, and economic impact of medical phenomena. The field of social medicine seeks to: understand how social and economic conditions impact health, disease and the practice of medicine and foster conditions in which this understanding can lead to a healthier society.

 

This type of study began formally in the early 19th century. The Industrial Revolution and the subsequent increase in poverty and disease among workers raised concerns about the effect of social processes on the health of the poor.

 

Prominent figures in the history of social medicine include Rudolf Virchow, Salvador Allende, and more recently Paul Farmer and Jim Yong Kim.

 

More specifically, Farmer et al. (2006) state that "Biosocial understandings of medical phenomena [such as the social determinants of health] are urgently needed". Paul Farmer's view is that modern medicine is focused at the molecular level, and there is a "gap" between social analysis and everyday clinical practices Moreover, Farmer, Nizeye, Stulac and Keshavjee (2006) view social medicine with increasing importance as scientific inquiry is increasingly "desocialized". The latter refers to "...a tendency to ask only biological question about what are in fact biosocial phenomena.

 

The field of social medicine is most commonly addressed today by public health efforts to understand what are known as social determinants of health.

 

Social medicine is distinguished from medico biological and clinical disciplines that study healthy and diseased states of the body.

Social medicine is closely related to the social sciences, including political economy, sociology, demography, and the general theory of administration. It concentrates primarily on social conditions and studies the interrelationships between social and biological factors in medicine. Evaluations are made primarily on the basis of statistics.


Social medicine also utilizes evaluations made by specialists in various fields, experiments, models, questionnaires, and the historical method.

 

The bases of social medicine are associated with the study of occupational diseases, medico topographical data, and publichealth statistics. In the late 18th century the use of J. P. Frank’s system of medical police promoted the state regulation of public health. In the 19th century the development of social medicine was associated with the rise of capitalism and with bourgeoisdemocratic revolutions. In Great Britain, France, Germany, and other countries data were gathered on how working and living conditions affected the health of workers. Statistical methods were used in making evaluations, and attempts were made to substantiate scientifically publichealth measures. The term “social medicine” was introduced at this time.

 

From the late 18th century until the 1870’s specific issues were presented in medical police and socialmedicine courses in various countries. At the turn of the 20th century chairs of social medicine were established, and independent courses in social medicine and social hygiene were given by A. V. KorchakChepurkovskii in Kiev (from 1906), A. I. Shingarev in St. Petersburg (from 1908), L. Teleky in Vienna (from 1909), and A. Grotjahn in Berlin (from 1912). The subsequent development of social medicine proceeded under the influence of social democratic ideas and the class struggle of the proletariat in capitalist countries.

 

The organizational basis of social medicine is the Soviet system of public health, which is directed toward the socioeconomic transformation of society and the elimination of social roots generating diseases and which makes available state measures for the protection of the health of citizens. It is under socialist conditions that social medicine is best able to elaborate the scientific bases for therapeutic preventive measures fostering the harmonious physical and spiritual development of man and promoting maximum life expectancy. The development of social medicine and the introduction of preventive medicine into medical practice and into the system of medical education were promoted by the activities of the sub departments of social medicine created in the First Moscow State University (N. A. Semashko, 1922), the Second Moscow State University (Z. P. Solov’ev, 1923), and the State Institute of Social Medicine (A. V. Mol’kov, 1923). Sub departments of social medicine were later created in all higher medical institutions.

 

The leading scientific center on social medicine and publichealth administration is the N. A. Semashko AllUnion Scientific Research Institute of Social Medicine and the Organization of Public Health of the Ministry of Public Health of the USSR (Moscow). Research is being conducted in the USSR on theoretical issues of social medicine and the organization of public health, on social conditions and the health of the population, and on the scientific foundations of the economics and planning of public health. An automated publichealth planning and administration system is being developed, and the scientific foundations of the organization of medical care and the training and education of the population in social medicine are under study. Social medicine is part

of the curriculum at several institutions outside the USSR, including the Institute of Social Hygiene and Health Organization of the People’s Republic of Bulgaria, the Academy for Advanced Training of Physicians in the German Democratic Republic, and the Institute of Social Medicine and Organization of Public Health of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic. AllUnion, republic, and local societies of hygienists and publichealth physicians have groups specializing in social medicine. International organizations that function in the area of social medicine include the World Health Organization (founded 1948), the International Medical Association for the Study of Living Conditions and Health (founded 1951), and the European Association of Social Medicine (founded 1955).

 

In the USSR, social medicine is taught at medical institutes by departments of therapeutics, pediatrics, and public health and hygiene under the control of sub departments of social medicine and publichealth organizations (from 1941 to 1966— subdepartments of publichealth organizations). Outside the USSR it is controlled by sub departments of social medicine, publichealth organizations, and community health protection.

 

The most important domain of social medicine is the culture itself. Health professionals and institutions have their own cultures that also go beyond clinical interactions. Health systems and health research both contain agendas, prejudices, and beliefs that can lead to certain perspectives being favored as the most legitimate. Understanding the culture of medicine is essential to understanding health professionals' attitudes toward illness, patients, and treatments

 

2. Genesis and evolution of social medicine:

 

Preventive and Social Medicine (PSM) is relatively a new branch of medicine. It is often considered synonymous with Community Medicine, Public Health, and Community Health in India. All these share common ground, i.e. prevention of disease and promotion of health. In short, PSM provides comprehensive health services ranging from preventive, promotive, curative to rehabilitative services. The importance of the specialty of PSM has been very well recognized and emphasized repeatedly from grass root to international levels, not only in health sector but in other related sectors too. Whereas clinical specialties look after individual patient, PSM has to think and act in terms of whole community. The scope of medicine has expanded during the last few decades to include not only health problems of individuals, but those of communities as well. If we want to achieve Health for All, Community Medicine will definitely be the key factor during the next millennium.

 

The following points elaborate the evolution of social medicine:

 

The industrial revolution of the 18th century while bringing affluence also brought new problems slums, accumulation of refuse and human excreta, overcrowding and a variety of social problems. Frequent outbreaks of cholera added to the woes Chadwick’s report on ‘The Sanitary Conditions of Laboring Population (1842)’ focused the attention of the people and Government on the urgent need to improve public health. Filth and garbage were recognized as man’s greatest enemies and it lead to great sanitary awakening bringing Public Health Act of 1848 in England, in acceptance of the principle that the state is responsible for the health of the people. The act was made more comprehensive in 1875 when Public Health Act 1875 was enacted. The public health movement in USA followed closely the English pattern. The organized professional body, American Public Health Association was formed in 1872. The Indian Public Health Association was formed in 1958.

 

Public Health is defined as the process of mobilizing local, state, national and international resources to solve the major health problems affecting communities and to achieve Health For All by 2000 AD.

 

Many different disciplines contributed to the growth of Public Health; physicians diagnosed diseases; sanitary engineers built water and sewerage systems; epidemiologists traced the sources of disease outbreaks and their modes of transmission; vital statisticians provided quantitative measures of births and deaths; lawyers wrote sanitary codes and regulations; public health nurses provided care and advice to the sick in their home; sanitary inspectors visited factories and markets to enforce compliance with public health ordinances; and administrators tried to organize everyone within the limits of the health departments budgets. Public Health thus involved Economics, Sociology, Psychology, Law, Statistics, and Engineering as well as biological and clinical sciences. Soon another important and emerging branch of medicine i.e., Microbiology became an integral part of Public Health. Public Health during the 19th Century was around sanitary regulations and the same underwent changes

 

Preventive Medicine developed as a branch of medicine distinct from Public Health. By definition, preventive medicine is applied to ‘healthy’ people, customarily by actions affecting large numbers or populations. Its primary objective is prevention of disease and promotion of health. It got a firm foundation only after the discovery of causative agents of diseases and the establishment of the germ theory of disease. The development of laboratory methods for the early detection of disease was a further advance.

Social Medicine has varying meanings attached to it. By derivation, it is the study of man as a social being in his total environment. It may be identified with care of patients, prevention of disease, administration of medical services; indeed with almost any subject in the extensive field of health and welfare. In short, social medicine is not a new branch of medicine but rather a new orientation of medicine to the changing needs of man and society.

Community Medicine has been defined as that specialty which deals with populations…. and comprises those doctors who try to measure the needs of the population, both sick and well, who plan and administer services to meet those needs, and those who are engaged in research and teaching in the field.

 

Decades old concept of health care approach has experienced a dramatic change. Today health is not merely an absence of disease; it is related to quality of life instead. Health is considered a means of productivity. Thus health development is essential to socioeconomic development as a whole. Since health is an integral part of development, all sectors of society have an effect on health. Scope of medicine has extended from individual to community. Study of health and disease in population is replacing study of disease in man. Germ theory of disease gave place to

newer concepts multifactorial causation. Social and behavioral aspects of the disease have been accorded a new priority. Contemporary medicine is no longer solely an art and science for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases. It is also the science for the prevention of disease and promotion of health. Today technical sophistication of modern medicine is not an answer to everyday common ailments of the vast poor in the country. Appropriate technology and cheaper interventions like Oral Rehydration Solution (ORS), immunization, etc are increasingly being applied as life saving measures and for disease prevention in community health care. Physicians’ role is no longer confined to diagnosing and treating those who come to the clinic. He is also responsible for those who need his service but cannot come to the clinic. Health of the people is not only the concern of health care providers. It is the responsibility of the community also to identify and solve their own health problems through their active participation.

 

All these changes in concept and ideas of health and health care system are embodied in community health care. The spate of new ideas and concepts, for example, increasing importance given to social justice and equity, recognition of crucial role of community participation called for the new approaches to make medicine in the service of humanity more effective.

 

AlmaAta declaration in 1978 specified that Primary Health Care approach was the way of achieving the goal of Health For All by 2000 AD. Primary Health Care approach stressed that “essential health care should be made universally accessible to individuals and acceptable to them, through their full participation and at a cost the community and the country can afford”.

 

3.  Development of preventive and social medicine:

 

The Public Health administration in India actually started in 1869 with the appointment of a Sanitary Commission. The first Municipal Act was passed in 1884 in Bengal. But in the Indian context J. P. Grant had visualized in 1939 that foreign models could not be suited for First Doctor Intervention or for Primary Health Care. His recommendations were also incorporated in Bhore Committee Report 1946, for building Community Physicians. The Bhore Committee’s Report laid the foundation of modern public health care in India.

On the recommendations of Medical Education Conference in 1955, departments of Preventive and Social Medicine were established in Medical colleges all over the country. The experimental learning of our predecessors and Gurus provided the foundation and led to growth and expansion of the frontiers of the subject of Community Medicine. It has today evolved as a field of learning that contributes immensely to the progress and development of societies, more significantly in developing nations like India. The professionals of Community Medicine have a major responsibility to shoulder i.e., to work for the health and well being of the people of India and contribute to education and production of basic doctors, well versed with handling community health problems. The objective of medical education is to produce a basic doctor who is competent to give comprehensive health care to individual, family and community. We need to bring about many changes, reforms in current medical education for achieving the desired objective.

 

These departments have teaching / training, service and research components. But initially more emphasis was placed on teaching / training aspect. Beyond 1975, faculty members of Community Medicine were enriched with the field experiences in training, monitoring and evaluation with active participation in various National Programmes like ICDS (Integrated Child Development Scheme), EPI (Expanded Program on Immunization), UIP (Universal Immunization Program), CSSM (Child Survival and Safe Motherhood programme), NACP (National AIDS Control Program), RCH (Reproductive and Child Health programme) and have shared their experiences with the District / State / National Health Programme managers and also translated their experiences in Undergraduate and Postgraduate training and teaching.There are variations in teaching / training in Preventive and Social Medicine in different states of India which reflects the cultural diversity and varying needs of the local community. The research component has been a very poorly developed component of PSM so far mainly because of scarcity of funds.

 

Medical colleges have the primary function of imparting undergraduate medical education. These colleges form the majority of institutions in India, which provide professional postgraduate qualification in Public Health. A school of public health like All India Institute of Hygiene and Public Health, Calcutta, especially established for the purpose without the responsibility of undergraduate medical education is an exception.

It is noted that many medical colleges are unable to have good communityoriented, field based programmes for demonstration and participatory education of the undergraduates. Medical colleges, by and large, remain isolated from health care system and play very limited role in public health services. However, desirable and positive changes through various approaches are taking place in the medical education system all over the world and in our country to enable it to stand up to the expectations of the country in the context of its overall socialeconomichealth development process e.g., by reorientation of curriculum, by communitybased integrated teaching or by making medical colleges assume direct responsibility in providing health care, etc.

 

It is noted that many medical colleges are unable to have good communityoriented, field based programmes for demonstration and participatory education of the undergraduates. Medical colleges, by and large, remain isolated from health care system and play very limited role in public health services. However, desirable and positive changes through various approaches are taking place in the medical education system all over the world and in our country to enable it to stand up to the expectations of the country in the context of its overall socialeconomichealth development process e.g., by reorientation of curriculum, by communitybased integrated teaching or by making medical colleges assume direct responsibility in providing health care, etc.

 

It is noted that many medical colleges are unable to have good communityoriented, field based programmes for demonstration and participatory education of the undergraduates. Medical colleges, by and large, remain isolated from health care system and play very limited role in public health services. However, desirable and positive changes through

various approaches are taking place in the medical education system all over the world and in our country to enable it to stand up to the expectations of the country in the context of its overall socialeconomichealth development process e.g., by reorientation of curriculum, by communitybased integrated teaching or by making medical colleges assume direct responsibility in providing health care, etc.

 

4:  Challenges

 

In the field of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, tremendous changes have taken place, but greater changes can be anticipated in the coming decades. Ideas and policies cannot be static and planning must have enough flexibility to cope with the fastchanging world of science and technology, of industrialization and urbanization. It is obvious that new horizons and superspecialties are fast emerging in Preventive and Social Medicine, like Epidemiology, MCH (Maternal and Child Health), IEC (Information Education Communication), Health Management, Health Economics, Nutrition, Demography, Health System Research, Environmental Health, etc. Current developments in Information Technology will certainly alter the face of Preventive and Social Medicine in the coming future.

 

In the field of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, tremendous changes have taken place, but greater changes can be anticipated in the coming decades. Ideas and policies cannot be static and planning must have enough flexibility to cope with the fastchanging world of science and technology, of industrialization and urbanization. It is obvious that new horizons and superspecialties are fast emerging in Preventive and Social Medicine, like Epidemiology, MCH (Maternal and Child Health), IEC (Information Education Communication), Health Management, Health Economics, Nutrition, Demography, Health System Research, Environmental Health, etc. Current developments in Information Technology will certainly alter the face of Preventive and Social Medicine in the coming future.

 

There are many challenges in the field of Public Health. One of the challenges, which are successfully met, is “Eradication of Smallpox”. This is a wonderful achievement which all of us are proud of. Another disease, which is successfully eliminated, is Guinea worm disease. There were setbacks in some of the programmes like Malaria, Tuberculosis that made us rethink and remodify the strategies and reimplement these national health programmes. As we are able to control some diseases, there will be new emerging as well reemerging diseases. This faculty has to be remain alert all the time and prepared for meeting the new challenges

 

Study Material, Lecturing Notes, Assignment, Reference, Wiki description explanation, brief detail
Sociology of Health : Sociology of Health : Evolution of Social medicine in India |


Privacy Policy, Terms and Conditions, DMCA Policy and Compliant

Copyright © 2018-2024 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.