Further
Alcohols can be classified as two major types, they are:
1. Methanol
2. Ethanol
Methanol:
Of all
the fuels being considered as an alternate to gasoline, methanol is one of the
more promising and has experienced major research and development. Pure
methanol and mixtures of methanol and gasoline in various percentages have been
extensively tested in engines and vehicles for a number of years [88, 130]. The
most common mixtures are M85 (85% methanol and 15% gasoline) and M10 (10%
methanol and 90% gasoline). The data of these tests which include performance
and emission levels are compared to pure gasoline (MO) and pure methanol
(M100). Some smart flexible-fuel (or
variable-fuel) engines are capable
of using any random mixture combination of methanol and gasoline ranging from
pure methanol to pure gasoline. Two fuel tanks are used and various flow rates
of the two fuels can be pumped to the engine, passing through a mixing chamber.
Using information from sensors in the intake and exhaust, the EMS adjusts to
the proper air-fuel ratio, ignition timing, injection timing, and valve timing
(where possible) for the fuel mixture being used. Fast, abrupt changes in fuel
mixture combinations must be avoided to allow for these adjustments to occur
smoothly.
One
problem with gasoline-alcohol mixtures as a fuel is the tendency for alcohol to
combine with any water present. When this happens the alcohol separates locally
from the gasoline, resulting in a non- homogeneous mixture. This causes the
engine to run erratically due to the large AF differences between the two
fuels. At least one automobile company has been experimenting with a three-fuel
vehicle which can use any combination of gasoline-methanol-ethanol. Methanol
can be obtained from many sources, both fossil and renewable. These include
coal, petroleum, natural gas, biomass, wood, landfills, and even the ocean.
However, any source that requires extensive manufacturing or processing raises
the price of the fuel and requires an energy input back into the overall
environmental picture, both unattractive.
Emissions
from an engine using MlO fuel are about the same as those using gasoline. The
advantage (and disadvantage) of using this fuel is mainly the 10% decrease in
gasoline use. With M85 fuel there is a measurable decrease in HC and CO exhaust
emissions. However, there is an increase in NOx and a large (= 500%) increase
in formaldehyde formation.
Methanol
is used in some dual-fuel CI engines. Methanol by itself is not a good CI fuel
because of its high octane number, but if a small amount of diesel oil is used
for ignition, it can be used with good results. This is very attractive for
third-world countries, where methanol can often be obtained much cheaper than
diesel oil.
Older CI
bus engines have been converted to operate on methanol in tests conducted in
California. This resulted in an overall reduction of harmful emissions compared
with worn engines operating with diesel fuel.
Ethanol
Ethanol
has been used as automobile fuel for many years in various regions of the
world. Brazil is probably the leading user, where in the early 1990s, 4.5 million
vehicles operated on fuels that were 93% ethanol. For a number of years gasohol has been available at service
stations in the United States, mostly in the Midwest corn-producing states.
Gasohol is a mixture of 90% gasoline and 10% ethanol. As with methanol, the
development of systems using mixtures of gasoline and ethanol continues. Two
mixture combinations that are important are E85 (85% ethanol) and EI0
(gasohol). E85 is basically an alcohol fuel with 15% gasoline added to
eliminate some of the problems of pure alcohol (i.e., cold starting, tank
flammability, etc.). ElO reduces the use of gasoline with no modification
needed to the automobile engine. Flexible-fuel engines are being tested which
can operate on any ratio of ethanol-gasoline.
Ethanol
can be made from ethylene or from fermentation of grains and sugar. Much of it
is made from corn, sugar beets, sugar cane, and even cellulose (wood and
paper). In the United States, corn is the major source. The present cost of
ethanol is high due to the manufacturing and processing required. This would be
reduced if larger amounts of this fuel were used. However, very high production
would create a food-fuel competition, with resulting higher costs for both.
Some studies show that at present in the United States, crops grown for the
production of ethanol consume more energy in ploughing, planting, harvesting,
fermenting, and delivery than what is in the final product. This defeats one
major reason for using an alternate fuel. Ethanol has less HC emissions than
gasoline but more than methanol.
Related Topics
Privacy Policy, Terms and Conditions, DMCA Policy and Compliant
Copyright © 2018-2023 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.