(i) Collection points: These affect such collection system components as crew size and storage, which ultimately control the cost of collection. Note that the collection points depend on locality and may be residential, commercial or industrial.
(ii) Collection frequency: Climatic conditions and requirements of a locality as well as containers and costs determine the collection frequency. In hot and humid climates, for example, solid wastes must be collected at least twice a week, as the decomposing solid wastes produce bad odour and leachate. And, as residential wastes usually contain food wastes and other putrescible (rotting) material, frequent collection is desirable for health and aesthetic reasons. Besides climates, the quality of solid waste containers on site also determines the collection frequency. For instance, while sealed or closed containers allow collection frequency up to three days, open and unsealed containers may require daily collection. Collection efficiency largely depends on the demography of the area (such as income groups, community, etc.), where collection takes place.
cost, e.g., optimal collection frequency reduces the cost as it involves fewer trucks, employees and reduction in total route distance; storage space, e.g., less frequent collection may require more storage space in the locality; sanitation, e.g., frequent collection reduces concerns about health, safety and nuisance associated with stored refuse.
(iii) Storage containers: Proper container selection can save collection energy, increase the speed of collection and reduce crew size. Most importantly, containers should be functional for the amount and type of materials and collection vehicles used. Containers should also be durable, easy to handle, and economical, as well as resistant to corrosion, weather and animals. In residential areas, where refuse is collected manually, standardised metal or plastic containers are typically required for waste storage. When mechanised collection systems are used, containers are specifically designed to fit the truck-mounted loading mechanisms efficiency, i.e., the containers should help maximise the overall collection efficiency.
convenience, i.e., the containers must be easily manageable both for residents and
compatibility, i.e., the containers must be compatible with collection equipment.
public health and safety, i.e., the containers should be securely covered and stored.
ownership, i.e., the municipal ownership must guarantee compatibility with collection
(iv)Collection crew (see also Subsection 3.3.1): The optimum crew size for a community depends on labour and equipment costs, collection methods and route characteristics. The size of the collection crew also depends on the size and type of collection vehicle used, space between the houses, waste generation rate and collection frequency. For example, increase in waste generation rate and quantity of wastes collected per stop due to less frequent collection result in a bigger crew size. Note also that the collection vehicle could be a motorised vehicle, a pushcart or a trailer towed by a suitable prime mover (tractor, etc.). It is possible to adjust the ratio of collectors to collection vehicles such that the crew idle time is minimised. However, it is not easy to implement this measure, as it may result in an overlap in the crew collection and truck idle time. An effective collection crew size and proper workforce management can influence the productivity of the collection system. The crew size, in essence, can have a great effect on overall collection costs. However, with increase in collection costs, the trend in recent years is towards:
ü Decrease in the frequency of collection;
ü Increase in the dependence on residents to sort waste materials;
ü This trend has, in fact, contributed to smaller crews in municipalities.
Collection route: The collection programme must consider the route that is efficient for collection. An efficient routing of collection vehicles helps decrease costs by reducing the labour expended for collection. Proper planning of collection route also helps conserve energy and minimise working hours and vehicle fuel consumption. It is necessary therefore to develop detailed route configurations and collection schedules for the selected collection system. The size of each route, however, depends on the amount of waste collected per stop, distance between stops, loading time and traffic conditions. Barriers, such as railroad, embankments, rivers and roads with heavy traffic, can be considered to divide route territories. Routing (network) analyses and planning can: increase the likelihood of all streets being serviced equally and consistently; help supervisors locate or track crews quickly; provide optimal routes that can be tested against driver judgement and experience.
(vi) Transfer station : A transfer station is an intermediate station between final disposal option and collection point in order to increase the efficiency of the system, as collection vehicles and crew remain closer to routes. If the disposal site is far from the collection area, it is justifiable to have a transfer station, where smaller collection vehicles transfer their loads to larger vehicles, which then haul the waste long distances. In some instances, the transfer station serves as a pre- processing point, where wastes are dewatered, scooped or compressed. A centralised sorting and recovery of recyclable materials are also carried out at transfer stations (EPA, 1989). The unit cost of hauling solid wastes from a collection area to a transfer station and then to a disposal site decreases, as the size of the collection vehicle increases.
Copyright Â© 2018-2021 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. (BS) Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.