Home | Rational Numbers

When you want to count the number of books in your cupboard, you start with 1, 2, 3, … and so on.

**Rational Numbers**

When you want to count the number of books in your
cupboard, you start with 1, 2, 3, … and so on. These counting numbers 1, 2, 3,
… , are called Natural numbers. You know to show these numbers on a line (see
Fig. 2.1).

We use N to denote the set of all natural numbers.

N= { 1, 2, 3, … }

Suppose there are 5 books in your cupboard and you
remove them one by one; the number of books diminish step by step. You remove
one, it becomes 4, remove one more, it becomes 3, again one more is removed
leaving 2, once again remove one and you are left with 1. If this last one is
also taken out, the cupboard is empty (since no books are there). To denote
such a situation we use the symbol 0. It denotes absence of any quantity. Thus
to say “there are no books”, you can write “the number of books is zero”.
Including zero as a digit you can now consider the numbers 0, 1, 2, 3, … and
call them **Whole numbers**. With this
additional entity, the number line will look as shown below

We use W to denote the set of all Whole numbers.

W= { 0, 1, 2, 3, … }

Certain conventions lead to more varieties of
numbers. Let us agree that certain conventions may be thought of as “**positive**” denoted by a ‘+’ sign. A
thing that is ‘up’ or ‘forward’ or ‘more’ or ‘increasing’ is positive; and
anything that is ‘down’ or ‘backward’ or ‘less’ or ‘decreasing’ is “**negative**” denoted by a ‘–’ sign.

For example, if I make a profit of Rs.1000 in my
business, I would call that +1000, and if I lose Rs. 5000, that would be -5000.
Why? Similarly, if a mountain’s base is 2 km below sea level and its peak is 3
km above sea level, then the altitude of its base is –2 and the altitude of its
peak is +3. (What is its total height? Is it 5 km?).

With this understanding, you can treat natural
numbers as positive numbers and rename them as **positive integers**; thereby you have enabled the entry of negative
integers –1, –2, –3, … .

Note that –2 is “more negative” than –1. Therefore,
among –1 and –2, you find that –2 is smaller and –1 is bigger. Are –2 and –1
smaller or greater than –3? Think about it.

The number line at this stage may be given as
follows:

We use Z to denote the set of all **Integers**.

Z= { …, –3, –2, –1, 0, 1, 2, 3, … }.

Draw a copy of Fig 2.2. Hold your whole number line
up to a mirror on zero. You will see the natural numbers reflected in the
mirror. The reflected numbers attached with a minus sign are negative integers.
So the numbers to the left of 0 are negative, and the numbers to the right of 0
are positive. But 0 is neither negative nor positive; 0 is just 0. It’s
non-committal!

When you look at the figures (Fig. 2.2 and 2.3)
above, you are sure to get amused by the gap between any pair of consecutive
integers. Could there be some numbers in between?

How did you actually draw the number line N (Fig.
2.1) initially? Draw any line, mark a point 1 on it. From 1, choose another
point on its right side at a preferred ‘unit’ distance and call it 2. Repeat
this as many times as you desire. To get W (Fig. 2.2), from 1, go one unit on
the left to get 0. Now Z is easier; just repeat the exercise on the left side.

You have come across fractions already. How will
you mark the point that shows 1/2 on Z? It is just midway between 0 and 1. In
the same way, you can plot 1/3, 1/4, 1/5,2 3/4.... etc. You may find that many
different fractions are shown by the same point. Can you say ‘why’? Will 5/4
and 10/8 be represented by the same point? Do you think 7/9 and 35/55 represent
the same point? You will now easily visualize similar fractions on the left
side of zero. These are all fractions of the form a/b where a and b are integers with one
restriction that b ≠ 0. (Why?) If a fraction is in decimal form, even then the
setting is same.

Because of the connection between fractions and
ratios of lengths, we name them as **Rational
numbers**. Here is a rough picture of the situation:

Since a fraction can have many equivalent fractions
, there are many possible names for the same rational number. Thus 1/3, 2/6,
8/24 8 all these denote the same rational number.

Consider a, b where a > b and their
AM(Arithmetic Mean) given by a+b / 2. Is this AM a rational number? Let us see.

Thus, for any two rational numbers, their
average/midpoint is rational. We can repeat this process indefinitely to
produce infinitely many rational numbers.

Find any two rational numbers between 1/2 and 2/3.

*Solution 1*

There is an interesting result that could help you
to write instantly rational numbers between any two given rational numbers.

Let us take the same example: Find any two rational
numbers between 1/2 and 2/3

*Solution 2*

*Solution 3*

Any more new methods to solve? Yes, if decimals are
your favourites, then the above example can be given an alternate solution as
follows:

*Solution 4*

Tags : Property, Solved Example Problems | Mathematics , 9th EM Mathematics : Real Numbers

Study Material, Lecturing Notes, Assignment, Reference, Wiki description explanation, brief detail

9th EM Mathematics : Real Numbers : Rational Numbers | Property, Solved Example Problems | Mathematics

Privacy Policy, Terms and Conditions, DMCA Policy and Compliant

Copyright © 2018-2024 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.