HOW TO FEED THE PATIENT
After total parenteral nutrition (TPN) was
estab-lished as a feasible approach for feeding patients lacking a functional
gut, physicians extended the practice of TPN to many circumstances where
“logic” and “clinical experience” suggested that it would be better than EN.
For example, one such indication was in the patient with acute pancreatitis,
where, in the 1970s, many clinicians thought that a period of TPN would put the
gut and pancreas at “rest,” allowing for resolution of pain and weight loss.
Unfortunately, “logic” and “clinical experience” were incorrect. Now, the
worldwide consensus expressed in clinical practice guidelines is that patients
with acute pancreatitis (and indeed all oth-ers with functioning guts) will
have worse outcomesif TPN is provided, rather than EN. Today, the indications
for TPN are narrow and includepatients who cannot absorb enteral solutions
(small bowel obstruction, short gut syndrome, etc.); partial PN may be
indicated to supplement EN, in cases in which EN cannot fully provide for
nutritional needs. In the latter circumstance, recent evidence suggests that
the decision to add supplemental PN should be made only after a week’s time in
previously well-nourished patients. Earlier initiation of supplemen-tary PN in
previously well-nourished patients, as had been supported by 2009 European
guidelines, resulted in worse outcomes in a large randomized clinical trial;
however, these results are not firmly established, as smaller randomized
clinical trials have suggested findings to the contrary. The diver-gent results
from these recent trials may be associ-ated with the type of parenteral formulations
being used, types of patients being studied, timing of par-enteral nutritional
administration, and treatment in the control groups. Thus, further studies are
needed to better define patients that may benefit from PN, as well as the
optimal timing of nutritional support and formulations for feeding. In short,
EN should be the primary mode of nutritional support, and PN should be used
when EN is not indicated, not tolerated, or insufficient.
There was a time when nearly every physician who took care of critically
ill patients was in the position of frequently ordering TPN for patients. This
is no longer the case, given that EN is now so much more widely employed. As a
consequence, many hospitals and health systems insist that a nutrition support
team take responsibility for those rarer patients who require TPN.
In general, patients with critical illness
should undergo whatever initial hemodynamic resuscita-tion they require before
initiation of nutritional support (either EN or PN). Absorption, distribu-tion,
and metabolism of nutrients require tissue blood flow, oxygen, and carbon
dioxide removal. Adequate tissue blood flow requires an adequately resuscitated
patient. Nutrient delivery to ischemic tissues may cause tissue damage by
increasing car-bon dioxide and oxidant production while consum-ing energy.
Patients with critical illness who require EN will usually require placement of
a feeding tube. Feeding tubes may be placed into the stomach in patients with
adequate gastric emptying and low risk of aspiration. In patients with delayed
gastric emptying or those at high risk of aspiration, feeding tubes are best
placed into the small intestine. Ide-ally, the tip of such tubes will be sited
within the small intestine, either by transpyloric placement ofnasoenteral
tube or directly into the jejunum dur-ing abdominal surgery (via a percutaneous
route), reducing the likelihood of gastric distention and regurgitation.
Patients who are unable to eat, but require EN over long periods of time, will
often undergo percutaneous endoscopic placement of gastrostomy (PEG) tubes (the
tips of such tubes can be placed distal to the pylorus). One should con-firm
that the tips of all feeding tubes are appropri-ately placed before initiating
feeds to reduce the likelihood that EN solutions will be accidentally infused,
say, into the tracheobronchial tree or abdominal cavity.TPN will generally require that a venous access line be placed with the
catheter tip in the superior vena cava. Peripheral PN can support the
nutritional requirements of the patient, but necessitates the use of larger
volumes of fluids dueto the requirement for lower osmolarities than used with
central PN and increases the risk of phlebitis. The line or port through which
the TPN solution will be infused should be dedicated to this pur-pose, if at
all possible, and strict aseptic techniques should be employed for insertion
and care of the catheter.
Related Topics
Privacy Policy, Terms and Conditions, DMCA Policy and Compliant
Copyright © 2018-2023 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.