What are the advantages and disadvantages of the various anesthetic
options?
General anesthesia allows for excellent muscle
relax-ation and a secure airway. Also, the anesthetic can be con-tinued for as
long as the procedure lasts. However, it necessitates multiple drugs and may
foster hemodynamic instability. There is also a strong possibility of the
patient incurring postoperative nausea and vomiting from volatile agents,
opioids, and reversal agents, and a sore throat if tra-cheal intubation is
performed.
Spinal anesthesia also provides excellent
muscle relax-ation, but like general anesthesia may cause hemodynamic
instability. While general anesthesia can continue indefi-nitely, a spinal
anesthetic will only last a finite amount of time (as spinal catheters are not
utilized currently) and may wear off in the middle of a case, necessitating
conver-sion to a general anesthetic. Intrathecal morphine can provide excellent
postoperative pain relief but requires appropriate monitoring. Other
complications associated with spinal anesthesia include but are not limited to
postdural puncture headache, back pain, transient neu-ropathies, and the rare
but devastating consequence of epidural abscess and hematoma.
Epidural anesthesia can be titrated to allow
for better hemodynamic stability. If a catheter is placed, the anes-thetic can
be prolonged for an indefinite period of time. A catheter can also be utilized
for postoperative pain control. Onset is significantly slower than for spinal anes-thesia
and at times muscle relaxation may not be adequate, especially when there is a
“patchy” block. An epidural, like a spinal, carries the risk of neurologic
complications, headache, back pain, infection, and hematoma.
Both spinal and epidural anesthesia seem to
decrease the risk of deep vein thrombosis in the lower extremity.
A combined spinal/epidural technique provides
the excellent muscle relaxation and quick onset of spinal anes-thesia and the
ability to provide anesthesia indefinitely by placement of the epidural
catheter. A disadvantage of this technique, however, is that the efficacy of
the epidural catheter cannot be tested until the spinal anesthetic has begun to
recede. If the catheter is non-functional, this would necessitate converting to
a general anesthetic in the middle of the surgical procedure.
Femoral and sciatic nerve blocks, while
somewhat time-consuming to perform, in experienced hands proba-bly take as long
as the performance of a difficult spinal anesthetic. These nerve blocks, like
neuraxial anesthetics, obviate the need for the polypharmacy associated with
general anesthesia and at the same time allow for greater hemodynamic stability
compared with neuraxial anesthe-sia. The placement of femoral and sciatic nerve
catheters allow for the provision of excellent postoperative pain control.
Related Topics
Privacy Policy, Terms and Conditions, DMCA Policy and Compliant
Copyright © 2018-2023 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.