THE
PATIENT–DRUG–PATHOGEN INTERACTION
In the laboratory the strain
of pathogen, the number of infecting organisms, the culture medium, the
antibiotic concentration, and the duration of antibiotic exposure can be
precisely specified. This precision cannot be obtained in patients. In
addition, chemotherapy of hu-man disease is complex, as it depends on a complex
patient–drug–pathogen interaction. This interaction has six components:
·
Pharmacokinetics: What the patient does to the drug. For example, a patient with renal
failure will have diminished renal clearance of gen-tamicin.
·
Pharmacodynamics: What the drug does to the patient. For example, erythromycin
stimulates gut motilin receptors and may induce nausea. The patient may stop
taking the erythromycin.
·
Immunity: What the patient does to the pathogen. For example, a patient with
AIDS who is exposed to tuberculosis may develop the disease in spite of
receiving a course of postex-posure prophylactic antituberculosis
chemo-therapy, which would be effective in a patient with an intact immune
system. Immunity in-cludes both nonspecific complement-mediated opsonization
and specific antibody- and cell-mediated immunity.
·
Sepsis: What the pathogen does to the
patient. For example, a patient with
gram-negative bacillary pneumonia may receive a perfectly adequate course of
antibiotic chemotherapy, only to succumb to systemic inflammatory re-sponse
syndrome (SIRS), an exaggerated and counterproductive release of inflammatory
cy-tokines.
·
Resistance: What the pathogen does to the
drug. For example, some strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa produce a plasmid-mediated adeny-lase that inactivates
gentamicin by chemically altering its structure.
·
Selective toxicity: What the drug does to the pathogen. For example, acyclovir
triphosphate, the phosphorylated derivative of acyclovir, lacks the 3 -hydroxy
group necessary for adding the next nucleotide to the chain and ter-minates DNA
elongation. This effect is selec-tive, since herpes simplex DNA elongation is
inhibited by markedly lower concentrations than is mammalian DNA elongation.
To be clinically useful, a
chemotherapeutic drug must have both selective toxicity against pathogens and
fa- vorable pharmacokinetics. The processes of absorption, distribution,
metabolism, and elimination compose a drug’s pharmacokinetics. The
concentration of the drug in a patient’s body as a function of time is
determined by the dose administered and the drug’s pharmacoki-netics in that
patient.
Absorption from the
gastrointestinal tract can be af-fected by other drugs and by food. Aluminum,
calcium, and magnesium ions in antacids or dairy products form insoluble
chelates with all tetracyclines and inhibit their absorption. Food inhibits
tetracycline absorption but enhances doxycycline absorption; food delays but
does not diminish metronidazole absorption; fatty food en-hances griseofulvin
absorption.
The chemical structure of a
drug determines which enzymes metabolize it; a drug that fails to cross the
cell membrane because of its polarity or size will be unme-tabolized even if
biochemically active degradative en-zymes are present in the cytosol. Systemic
use of drugs that are poorly absorbed or are destroyed by the gas-trointestinal
environment requires parenteral adminis-tration. Of course, if the goal is to
attack pathogens in the gastrointestinal tract, then poor gastrointestinal
ab-sorption may be an advantage.
An antibiotic drug that is
itself nontoxic may have metabolites that are toxic, diminishing its
usefulness. For example, imipenem is hydrolyzed by renal dipeptidase to a
metabolite that is inactive against bacteria but is toxic to humans.
Coadministration of cilastatin inhibits the renal dipeptidase, which both
prevents the formation of the toxic metabolite and decreases imipenem
clear-ance, prolonging the half-life of the drug.
Partitioning of some drugs
into cells occurs. Red blood cells parasitized by malaria selectively take up
chloroquine, which accounts in part for the efficacy of this antimalarial
against intracellular malarial forms. The intrahepatocellular concentration of
chloroquine is 500 times that of the blood plasma concentration. Macrolides and
fluoroquinolones are also selectively partitioned into cells, which accounts in
part for their ef-ficacy against mycoplasma and chlamydia, both intra-cellular
pathogens.
Extensive protein binding of
a drug decreases its free level and decreases the compound’s glomerular
fil-tration. Because protein binding is reversible, bound drug and free drug
are in dynamic equilibrium; thus protein binding determines the optimal dose
and dosing interval of the drug. A drug’s pharmacokinetic proper-ties are an
important source of variation in the clinical response of patients to
chemotherapy.
As mentioned earlier,
pharmacokinetics is not solely the property of a drug but instead is the
consequence of interactions between the drug and the physiology of the patient.
Thus, statements like “the half-life of gentam-icin is 2 hours” are not very
useful, as the half-life is likely be longer or shorter in a given individual
patient.
Individualization of dosing
of chemotherapeutic drugs with a low therapeutic index is essential to
effective, safe chemotherapy.
The concentrations of
chemotherapeutic drugs in blood plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, or ascites
fluid can be measured to determine whether sufficient drug is present to
inhibit or kill a given pathogen and to ensure that the concentration is not so
high as to be toxic to the patient.
In severe bacterial
infections that are difficult to erad-icate, such as endocarditis or
osteomyelitis, it may be im-portant to ensure that the patient’s serum remains
bacte-ricidal at the lowest, or trough, concentration in the dosing interval.
Dilutions of patient’s serum can be incu-bated with the organism isolated from
the patient and the minimum bactericidal concentration determined through
serial dilutions. Treatment is considered adequate if the serum remains
bactericidal at a dilution of 1:8.
In the case of antibiotic
chemotherapy, the ideal phar-macodynamic response is usually no pharmacodynamic response; the
pharmacological target is not normal hu-man cells but rather a parasite, a
virus-infected human cell, or a cancerous cell. The less selective the chemother-apeutic drug, the greater the severity
of adverse effects. Cancer chemotherapy is often severely toxic, even life
threatening. Suppression of a viral infection, such as oc-curs in the treatment
of HIV with antiviral drugs, is of-ten complicated by serious drug-associated
toxicity, such as hepatotoxicity or bone marrow suppression.
Compared with other
pharmacological agents, anti-bacterial chemotherapeutic drugs are remarkably
safe. Toxicity is common mainly in patients who are given in-appropriately high
doses or who develop high drug lev-els because of decreased drug clearance.
Most antibi-otics are renally cleared, so renal failure is a common cause of
diminished antibiotic drug clearance.
The adverse reactions
associated with the use of an-tibacterial chemotherapy include allergic
reactions, toxic reactions resulting from inappropriately high drug doses,
interactions with other drugs, reactions related to alterations in normal body
flora, and idiosyncratic reac-tions. Several types of allergic responses occur,
including immediate hypersensitivity reactions (hives, anaphy-laxis), delayed
sensitivity reactions (interstitial nephri-tis), and hapten-mediated serum
sickness. Allergic cross-reactions to structurally related antibiotics can
occur. Although an alternative non–cross-reacting antibiotic is generally
preferred, desensitization protocols are avail-able for situations in which
there is no good alternative.
There is heterogeneity in
human populations for the hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 enzyme .
Possession of an unfavorable phenotype may place a patient at risk for drug
toxicity. For exam- ple, some patients who are slow acetylators of isoniazid
may develop peripheral neuropathy with standard-dose isoniazid therapy.
Toxicity is most likely in
tissues that interact with the drug. For example, gentamicin is polycationic
and binds to anionic phospholipids in the cell membranes of renal proximal
tubular cells, where it inhibits phospho-lipases and damages intracellular
organelles.
Some adverse reactions are
unrelated to either al-lergy or overdose; these are termed idiosyncratic. For instance, sulfonamides may precipitate acute
hemolysis in some people having a glucose-6-phosphate dehydro-genase
deficiency.
Many antibiotics alter the
enteric microbial flora, particularly if high concentrations reach the colon.
Antibiotic-sensitive bacteria are suppressed or killed, thereby removing their
inhibitory effects on potentially pathogenic organisms. Overgrowth of
pathogenic mi-crobes can then occur. Unlike anaerobes, Clostridium difficile is
resistant to clindamycin and some β-lactams.
Use of such an antibiotic permits the proliferation of C. difficile, which then
elaborates its toxin in high concen-tration. This toxin can cause
pseudomembranous colitis, which can be fatal if not recognized and treated.
The effectiveness of
chemotherapy is enhanced by adequate immune function; however, some antibiotics
suppress immune function. For example, tetracyclines can decrease leukocyte
chemotaxis and complement activation. Rifampin decreases the number of T
lym-phocytes and depresses cutaneous hypersensitivity. Antibiotics such as the
sulfonamides may induce granu-locytopenia or bone marrow aplasia. These effects
are not well understood but may be due to enteric bacterial metabolic
byproducts of these antibiotics.
In the absence of antibiotic
therapy, many patients survive infection, even infection by highly virulent
pathogens. Thus, immunity may be due to factors such as a high func-tional
reserve of organs or to an enhanced nonspecific op-sonization of pathogens by
complement. In other cases, specific partial immunoglobulin (Ig) G–mediated
immu-nity was produced during prior exposure to the pathogen or a new
IgM-mediated immunity develops during the course of the infection. Specific
immunity can be either cell mediated or antibody mediated and may be enhanced
by endogenously produced cytokines. Exogenously ad-ministered cytokines also
may prove clinically useful as adjuncts to antibiotic chemotherapy.
Sepsis, or SIRS, is a
maladaptive reaction to severe in-fection in which a variety of inflammatory
mediators are released. Some of these mediators are bacterial metabolic
products, while others are cytokines pro-duced by humans during infection or
other inflamma-tory disease. These mediators can induce failure of sev-eral
organ systems. Cardiac function can be suppressed; acute respiratory distress
syndrome can occur; renal failure is common; and disseminated intravascular
co-agulation can occur.
Through their ability to
cause cell lysis, antibiotics such as the β-lactams or aminoglycosides may
increase the release of bacterial inflammatory mediators (e.g., gram-negative
bacillary endotoxin). Antibiotics also may induce the release of endogenous
cytokines, such as interleukin (IL) 1- , IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α
) from monocytes and IL-4 and IFN- from lymphocytes. These cytokines are
important in inflam-matory and immunological responses and may con-tribute to
the development of SIRS. Alternatively, these cytokines also may enhance immune
function and en-hance antimicrobial activity. Although many drugs have been
examined for their ability to reverse SIRS, no clin-ical studies of interventions
in sepsis have yet been shown to significantly lessen mortality.
Some pathogens are naturally
resistant to certain chemotherapeutic drugs. Resistance can occur through
mutation, adaptation, or gene transfer. The mechanisms accounting for innate
and acquired resistance are es-sentially the same. Spontaneous mutation in
bacterial cells occurs at a frequency of approximately one per million cells.
Such mutations may confer resistance to the chemotherapeutic drug. Spontaneous
mutation is not a major concern unless the use of the drug results in selection
and proliferation of resistant mutant pathogens in the patient.
Resistance to an antibiotic
can be the result of one or more mechanisms. Alterations in the
lipopolysaccha-ride structure of gram-negative bacilli can affect the up-take
of lipophilic drugs. Similarly, changes in porins can affect the uptake of
hydrophilic drugs. Once the drug enters the cell, it may be enzymatically
inactivated. Some bacteria possess pumps that remove drugs from the bacterial
cytosol. The antibiotic also may be ineffec-tive as a result of mutation of
genes coding for the tar-get site (e.g., penicillin-binding proteins, DNA
gyrase, or ribosomal proteins).
It is clinically important to
understand the nature of the mechanism of resistance to an antibiotic drug. For
example, the β-lactam resistance of Streptococcus
pneu-moniae is due to the appearance of altered penicillin-binding
proteins. Thus, the use of a combination of a β-lactam and a penicillinase
inhibitor, such as clavulanate, will not overcome streptococcal β-lactam
resistance, be-cause the mechanism of resistance is not due to the production
of a penicillinase.
Multiple resistance may
occur. Such resistance is rec-ognized as a major problem in controlling
bacterial in-fections and may be either chromosome or plasmid me-diated. Plasmids (extrachromosomal genetic
elements), which code for enzymes that inactivate antimicrobials, can be
transferred by conjugation and transduction from resistant bacteria to
previously sensitive bacteria. Such a transfer can also occur between unrelated
species of bacteria. Enzymes coded by plasmids (e.g., penicillinase,
cephalosporinase, and acetylases) that are specific for a given antimicrobial
inactivate the drug either by re-moval or addition of a chemical group from the
mole-cule or by breaking a chemical bond. Transposons
are segments of genetic material with insertion sequences at the end of the
gene; these sequences allow genes from one organism to be easily inserted into
the genetic ma-terial of another organism. Some of these transposons code for
antibiotic resistance.
In vitro laboratory tests of
sensitivity of a microor-ganism to specific antimicrobial agents are used to
pre-dict efficacy in vivo. Often, it is enough to identify the causative
pathogen in culture; the general resistance pattern of the pathogen and local
patterns of resistance of the pathogen may then allow proper choice of
chemotherapy. It is sometimes helpful to measure the antibiotic sensitivity of
the specific isolated pathogen. Generally, a battery of tests against a
selection of possi-ble antibiotic drugs is employed.
Some organisms, such as Staphylococcus aureus, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Haemophilus influenzae, may produce β-lactamase
and therefore be resistant to penicillin and its congeners. Testing for β-lactamase
pro-duction by isolates enables an early decision on the use of penicillin and
congeners in treatment of the disease.
Antibiotics can be classified
according to their effects on the biochemistry or molecular biology of
pathogens. There are ribosomal inhibitors (macrolides), cell wall disrupters ( β-lactams),
DNA disturbers (fluoroquino-lones), and metabolic poisons
(trimethoprim-sulfa-methoxazole). Antibiotics also can be classified accord-ing
to whether they are static
(inhibitory) or cidal (lethal). The
classification of drugs as either static or cidal is based on laboratory
assessment of the interac-tion of pathogen and antibiotic drug.
Cidal effects can be a result
of the disruption of the cell wall or membrane. Cell lysis may occur when water
diffuses into the high-osmolarity bacterial cytosol through the
antibiotic-induced holes in the membrane, causing the bacteria to swell and
burst. Cidal effects also can occur as a consequence of inhibition of bacterial
DNA replication or transcription.
Static effects occur when the
toxic effects of a chemotherapeutic drug are reversible. For example,
inhibition of folate synthesis interferes with methylation, an important
biochemical synthetic process. Reversal of this static effect can occur when
the antibiotic concentration falls or if a compensatory increase in the
synthesis of the inhibited enzymes occurs. The static versus cidal designa-tion
is a false dichotomy, since there is a continuous spec-trum of activity between
the two categories. The place of a drug along this spectrum will depend on both
the phar-macological properties of the drug and such clinical fac-tors as
immune system function, inoculum size, drug concentration in tissue, and
duration of therapy. A cidal drug may prove to be merely static if an
inappropriately low dose or short treatment course is prescribed. A static drug
may be cidal if given in high doses for prolonged courses to exquisitely
sensitive pathogens.
Related Topics
Privacy Policy, Terms and Conditions, DMCA Policy and Compliant
Copyright © 2018-2023 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.