International Benchmarking
Benchmarking is comparing one’s business
processes and performance metrics to industry bests and best practices from
other companies.
There are four primary types of
benchmarking: internal, competitive, functional, and generic. Internal
benchmarking is a comparison of a business process to a similar process inside
the organization. Competitive benchmarking
is a direct competitor-to-competitor comparison of a product, service, process,
or method.The generic concept is related to the overall performance of the
chosen unit of MNC or business.
How Benchmarking works:
1.
Select a product, service or process to
benchmark.
2.
Identify the key performance metrics.
3.
Choose companies or internal areas to
benchmark.
4.
Collect data on performance and
practices.
5.
Analyze the data and identify
opportunities for improvement.
Benchmarking in Various parts of the
World
Independent Directors are a requirement
for listed companies in all Asian economies, where most require at least 1/3rd
of the Board to be independent. The 2012 Singapore corporate governance code
recommends a majority of Independent Directors when the chairman of the Board
is not independent. Committees of Boards such as audit, remuneration and Board
nomination are required in all Asian economies except Vietnam. In China, the
Audit Committee is to be composed of Independent Directors only.
The Council of Institutional Investors
(CII), Corporate Governance
Policies state that at least 2/3rd of the directors should
be independent. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is one of the
three standing committees, along with Audit Committee and Compensation
Committee, required by NYSE, to be composed entirely of Independent Directors.
G20/ OECD principles encourage formulation of Nomination Committee to ensure
proper compliance with established nomination procedures and to facilitate and
co-ordinate the search for a balanced and qualified Board.
Formulation of various Committees
i.
Audit Committee,
ii.
Advisory Committee,
iii.
Nomination and Remuneration Committee,
Stakeholder Relationship Committee The
U.S. National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD), recommends that
The Governance Committee should be
responsible for ensuring that a process exists for the Board to routinely
assess its own performance, the performance of its Committees as well as
individual directors to conduct self- assessment.
European commission urges member states to have sufficient number of
independent non-executive or supervisory directors on Board. G20/ OECD: The
latest principles encourage the prominent role of independent Board members. It
states that, it is a good practice where remuneration policy and contracts for
Board members and key executives is handled by a special committee of the
Board comprising either wholly or
a majority of Independent Directors. Independent Directors Board to have
specific proportion of Independent Directors Although, there is no specific law
to enforce number of women directors
on the Board, following countries
have taken steps to maintain the ratio of female Board representation (source:
www.cfainstitute. org): predetermined and measurable performance criteria,
including criteria of a non-financial Nature. The UK Corporate Governance Code
recommends evaluation of the Board of FTSE
350 companies to be
externally facilitated at least
every three years (on a comply-or- explain basis) The European Commission has proposed legislation that
would require nonexecutive directors to be 40% women by 2020, up from 16.6% in
2013.
In early 2014, Japanese Prime Minister
announced the goal of increasing the percentage of women in executive positions
at Japanese companies to 30% by 2020.
UK businesses had voluntary targets
first set in 2011 i.e. to have 25% women on FTSE100 (The Financial Times Stock
Exchange) Boards by 2015.
At the Federal level, two bills are
currently being tabled which will impose a 40% quota for female Board members
of public companies and other regulated entities such as banks and insurance
companies.
A bill pending in the Brazilian Senate
would impose a 40% female quota on the Boards of state owned enterprises by
2022. IBGC Code of Best Practices (Brazilian Institute of Corporate Governance)
recommends:
i.
A formal evaluation process of the
performance of the Board, of individual directors and of the CEO
ii.
The process to be conducted by the Chair
iii.
Participation of the outsider to make
the process more effective
iv.
Evaluation system adapted to each
organization
v.
Disclosure of the process of evaluation
to the shareholders
French parliament adopted a bill that
requires public companies making at least 50 million Euros in turnover and
employing more than 500 workers to have 40% female Board representation by
2017.
In November 2013, Germany’s Christian
Democrats and Social Democrats agreed on a gender quota on supervisory Boards
where, issuers would be required to have women comprise 30% of nonexecutive
directors by 2016. The planned legislation would require firms that don’t meet
the 30% mark to leave those seats vacant. The latest G20/ OECD principles
encourages measures such as voluntary targets, disclosure requirements,
Boardroom quotas and private initiatives
that enhance gender diversity on Boards and in senior management.
Woman Director
Requirement of at least 1 woman Director
on the Board for listed Companies and public companies
Globally, there is an increased
realization and acceptability that good corporate governance is a means to
create a business environment of trust, transparency and accountability in
order to support investment, financial stability and sustainable economic
growth. In the global and highly interconnected world of business and finance
where money and corporate operations constantly cross borders, creating trust
is something that we need to do together.
Related Topics
Privacy Policy, Terms and Conditions, DMCA Policy and Compliant
Copyright © 2018-2023 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.