Business Process Reengineering:
In the
first option of reengineering business processes, before implementing ERP, the
organization needs to analyze current processes, identify non-value adding
activities and redesign the process to create value for the customer, and then
develop in-house applications or modify an ERP system package to suit the
organizations requirements. In this case, employees will develop a good sense
of process orientation and ownership.
This
would also be a customized solution keeping with line of the organization's
structure, culture, existing IT resources, employee needs and disruption to
routine work during the change programmer likely to be the least. It could have
a high probability of implementation. The drawback of this option is that the
reengineered process may not be the best in the class, as the organization may
not have access to world-class release and best practices. Moreover, this may
be the only chance to radically improve in the near future and most attention
should be paid while choosing the right ERP. Also, developing an in-house
application or implementing a modified ERP is not advisable.
The
second option of implementing ERP package is to adopt ERP with minimum
deviation from the standard settings. All the processes in a company should
conform to the ERP model and the organization has to change its current work
practices and switch over to what the ERP system offers. This approach of
implementation offers a world-class efficient and effective process with
built-in measures and controls, and is likely to be quickly installed.
But if
the employees do not have good understanding of their internal customer needs
or current processes, or if these processes are not well defined and
documented, then it is quite possible that while selecting the standard process
from the ERP package, employees may not be able to perceive the difficulties
likely to be encountered during the implementation stage. Employees would lack
process ownership and orientation. Other than technical issues, issues like
organization structure, culture, lack of involvement of people etc. can lead to
major implementation difficulties, and full benefits of standard ERP package
may not be achieved. It may lead to a situation where the organization may have
to again reengineer its processes. This could be a very costly mistake.
There is
also a third option of reengineering business process during implementation of ERP.
But it does not considered to be a practical option and is likely to cause
maximum disruption to existing work. It should not be forgotten that during BPR
and ERP initiatives, routine work is still to be carried out and customers need
to be served.
Enterprise
resource planning (ERP) is a software platform that helps business owners
determine how to best use their available resources. Business process
re-engineering (BPR) involves observing and analyzing how the business works to
determine changes that may streamline operation at the business. ERP and BPR
can go hand-in-hand. An organization's management might use BPR as a means of
looking at the current operations of a business to determine how to best
proceed when designing or choosing a new ERP.
The goal
of business process re-engineering is to determine what changes can be made in
the way the business operates to improve aspects of a business. Often, BPR will
focus on a specific part of the business, like costs, customer service or
marketing and advertising. Using BPR does not necessarily lead to ERP. Though
ERP and BPR are related, a well-conducted BPR may find that there is no need
for an ERP platform in the business. A business conducting BPR may determine to
drop an ERP method for reasons including cost, effectiveness, or maintenance.
Related Topics
Privacy Policy, Terms and Conditions, DMCA Policy and Compliant
Copyright © 2018-2023 BrainKart.com; All Rights Reserved. Developed by Therithal info, Chennai.